Would you let Gemini tell you where to go? | The Vergecast
TL;DR
David Pierce introduces the Side Phone, a modular Android device with swappable attachments like keyboards and iPod-style click wheels designed to minimize digital distractions. He then welcomes professor Kate Clonic to argue that cookie consent banners should be abolished entirely—not reformed—as they create 'manufactured consent,' fail to prevent modern tracking, and prevent meaningful privacy innovation by allowing companies to claim compliance without protecting users.
📱 The Side Phone: Modular Minimalism 3 insights
Swappable hardware attachments change phone functionality
The device features a minimalist Android base with modular bottom attachments including a full keyboard, number pad for calls only, and an iPod-style click wheel for music.
Designed for single-purpose usage
The concept forces users to intentionally switch modes—such as declaring 'I am using this as a camera now'—making the device less useful for everything else and potentially reducing screen addiction.
Durability questions remain unanswered
While Pierce finds the hardware charming, he notes concerns about how the interchangeable parts will hold up over time and whether the approach actually delivers practical minimalism.
🍪 The Failure of Cookie Banners 3 insights
Banners create manufactured consent
Users reflexively click 'agree' without reading, giving them a false sense of agency and transparency while allowing companies to claim users consented to tracking.
Technology has outgrown cookie controls
Modern tracking uses fingerprinting and other methods that have 'lapped' cookie-based tracking, making cookie consent banners obsolete for actual privacy protection.
Current system blocks innovation
The banner compliance regime satisfies regulators and companies, removing pressure to develop better solutions while preventing discussions about effective privacy regulation.
⚖️ Regulatory History and Capture 3 insights
Origins predate GDPR by decades
The EU e-privacy directive from the early 2000s required offering users the right to refuse data processing, but never mandated pop-ups or banners specifically.
Industry defined compliance through regulatory capture
Without specific technical requirements, industry lawyers and lobbyists interpreted the law to mean banners, creating a 'state of stasis' that avoids fines but doesn't protect privacy.
Abolition would force necessary conversations
Clonic argues removing banners entirely would create a vacuum requiring new regulations and technological solutions that actually address modern tracking methods.
Bottom Line
Cookie banners should be completely eliminated to break the compliance deadlock and force the development of privacy protections that actually work, rather than maintaining the illusion of user consent.
More from The Verge
View all
Apple's best product ever | The Vergecast
The Vergecast hosts analyze OpenAI's strategic pivot from consumer AI products to enterprise automation, highlighting the growing disconnect between the industry's 'super intelligence' marketing promises and its actual delivery of business software tools, while also revealing that their Apple product ranking suffered a bot attack attempting to manipulate iTunes to number one.
Apple at 50: the good and the bad | The Vergecast
On Apple's 50th anniversary, veteran analyst Jason Snell evaluates the company as being at peak hardware performance due to Apple Silicon and manufacturing excellence, but currently struggling through a 'butterfly keyboard era' of software design where aesthetic ambitions like liquid glass are undermining usability across platforms.
Meta's court losses could be just the beginning | The Vergecast
The hosts navigate the chaotic TSA airport crisis caused by DHS funding disputes while debuting The Verge's interactive Apple 50th anniversary product ranker, alongside discussions of AI's impact on the legal system and complex iMac hardware modifications.
Welp, I bought an iPhone again | The Vergecast
After months of testing flip phones, foldables, and Android devices to escape iPhone boredom, host David Pierce reluctantly purchased an iPhone 17, concluding that the excruciating friction of switching ecosystems outweighs the benefits of alternative hardware despite Android's superior spam filtering.