Why AI Feels Like the Internet in 1997 | Benedict Evans on a16z
TL;DR
Benedict Evans compares today's AI landscape to the internet in 1997, arguing that agentic coding has emerged as the first true product-market fit use case while the industry grapples with severe infrastructure scarcity and an uncertain future where foundation models risk becoming commoditized infrastructure rather than value-capturing platforms.
đź’» The Coding Breakthrough 3 insights
Agentic coding achieved sudden product-market fit
Evans identifies agentic coding as the first AI application that shifted from marginally useful to fundamentally transformative, creating a supply crunch where customers are pulling tools out of vendors' hands.
Developers build for themselves first
Following the historical pattern of early PCs—where the first application was building more computers—software developers are using LLMs to automate software development before other use cases mature.
Industry focus narrowed from broad to specific
After OpenAI's initial 'everything at once' approach, the field has consolidated around coding following Anthropic's focused strategy, though it remains unclear which use case will bridge the gap to daily consumer adoption.
⚡ Infrastructure Scarcity & Economics 3 insights
$10 trillion spending ceiling creates hard constraints
Evans emphasizes that the industry faces absolute scarcity because there simply isn't $10 trillion annually available to spend on AI infrastructure, creating an unsustainable gap between demand and supply.
Pricing chaos mirrors mobile data crisis of 2009
Current market conditions—where users face either $20 monthly subscriptions or $10,000 surprise bills—exactly parallel the mobile data pricing breakdown before carriers implemented throttling and usage caps.
Capex overbuild threatens commodity pricing
With $1-2 trillion in capital expenditure coming online while models become 100x more efficient annually, infrastructure faces impending overcapacity that could eliminate pricing power for model providers.
🏠Commoditization & Value Capture 3 insights
Foundation models risk becoming commodity infrastructure
Lacking network effects and differentiation, models may follow the path of mobile operators and ISPs who built essential infrastructure but captured minimal value as the technology matured.
Historical precedent favors application layer value
Evans notes that chip companies, ISPs, and mobile operators collectively spent trillions on infrastructure yet saw flat stocks for decades, while operating systems like Windows and iOS captured value by enabling ecosystem lock-in.
Chatbots are not viable standalone products
Evans explicitly argues that chatbots and foundation models are not finished products but rather infrastructure components, comparing them to browsers that enabled value creation elsewhere rather than capturing it themselves.
âť“ Strategic Uncertainty 3 insights
Job market impacts remain unpredictable
While automation forces companies to reconsider why they hire junior engineers—to do tasks now automated or to train for future roles—Evans insists it is impossible to predict engineering team structures even three years out.
Enterprise adoption targets point solutions
Outside tech hubs, corporations deploy AI for specific back-office processes rather than general assistant use, such as commodities companies using LLMs exclusively for cash flow forecasting from irregular producer invoices.
Fundamental questions remain unanswered
Evans emphasizes that core uncertainties—including whether models can capture value up the stack, if there will be a single winner, and how to drive daily consumer usage—persist just as they did two years ago.
Bottom Line
Prepare for a multi-year infrastructure crunch where foundation models commoditize and value migrates to specialized applications, meaning builders should focus on vertical solutions rather than model infrastructure, while organizations should experiment with point solutions without betting on specific platform winners.
More from a16z Podcast
View all
Software in the Age of Agents | The a16z Show
The rise of AI agents is accelerating a shift toward 'headless' software where APIs and business logic matter more than user interfaces, but speakers warn that underestimating the complexity and stickiness of enterprise systems—where decades of regulatory compliance and institutional knowledge create deep moats—is a critical error as the industry moves beyond human-centric workflow design.
a16z Goes Global: Why American Tech Must Lead the World
a16z outlines its global expansion strategy to ensure American technological leadership in the AI era, arguing that AI models encode cultural values and that the U.S. must help allies adopt Western technology to prevent authoritarian 'digital colonization' and maintain national security through innovation.
Jake Paul on Going From YouTube to Boxing to Investing | a16z ft. Anti Fund
Jake Paul and Anti Fund co-founder Geoffrey Woo announce their oversubscribed $100 million growth fund backed by tier-one LPs like Andreessen Horowitz, while explaining how Paul's resilience and analytical operator mindset translate from entertainment to backing frontier tech companies.
The Media Game Has Changed
The media landscape has shifted from defense-oriented legacy outlets demanding plastic, controversy-free performances to an offense-driven ecosystem where authenticity and founder-led personal brands dominate; success now requires treating public conversations like private ones and building direct channels rather than relying on traditional press.