Why AI Feels Like the Internet in 1997 | Benedict Evans on a16z

| Podcasts | June 08, 2026 | 12 Thousand views | 1:00:33

TL;DR

Benedict Evans compares today's AI landscape to the internet in 1997, arguing that agentic coding has emerged as the first true product-market fit use case while the industry grapples with severe infrastructure scarcity and an uncertain future where foundation models risk becoming commoditized infrastructure rather than value-capturing platforms.

đź’» The Coding Breakthrough 3 insights

Agentic coding achieved sudden product-market fit

Evans identifies agentic coding as the first AI application that shifted from marginally useful to fundamentally transformative, creating a supply crunch where customers are pulling tools out of vendors' hands.

Developers build for themselves first

Following the historical pattern of early PCs—where the first application was building more computers—software developers are using LLMs to automate software development before other use cases mature.

Industry focus narrowed from broad to specific

After OpenAI's initial 'everything at once' approach, the field has consolidated around coding following Anthropic's focused strategy, though it remains unclear which use case will bridge the gap to daily consumer adoption.

⚡ Infrastructure Scarcity & Economics 3 insights

$10 trillion spending ceiling creates hard constraints

Evans emphasizes that the industry faces absolute scarcity because there simply isn't $10 trillion annually available to spend on AI infrastructure, creating an unsustainable gap between demand and supply.

Pricing chaos mirrors mobile data crisis of 2009

Current market conditions—where users face either $20 monthly subscriptions or $10,000 surprise bills—exactly parallel the mobile data pricing breakdown before carriers implemented throttling and usage caps.

Capex overbuild threatens commodity pricing

With $1-2 trillion in capital expenditure coming online while models become 100x more efficient annually, infrastructure faces impending overcapacity that could eliminate pricing power for model providers.

🏭 Commoditization & Value Capture 3 insights

Foundation models risk becoming commodity infrastructure

Lacking network effects and differentiation, models may follow the path of mobile operators and ISPs who built essential infrastructure but captured minimal value as the technology matured.

Historical precedent favors application layer value

Evans notes that chip companies, ISPs, and mobile operators collectively spent trillions on infrastructure yet saw flat stocks for decades, while operating systems like Windows and iOS captured value by enabling ecosystem lock-in.

Chatbots are not viable standalone products

Evans explicitly argues that chatbots and foundation models are not finished products but rather infrastructure components, comparing them to browsers that enabled value creation elsewhere rather than capturing it themselves.

âť“ Strategic Uncertainty 3 insights

Job market impacts remain unpredictable

While automation forces companies to reconsider why they hire junior engineers—to do tasks now automated or to train for future roles—Evans insists it is impossible to predict engineering team structures even three years out.

Enterprise adoption targets point solutions

Outside tech hubs, corporations deploy AI for specific back-office processes rather than general assistant use, such as commodities companies using LLMs exclusively for cash flow forecasting from irregular producer invoices.

Fundamental questions remain unanswered

Evans emphasizes that core uncertainties—including whether models can capture value up the stack, if there will be a single winner, and how to drive daily consumer usage—persist just as they did two years ago.

Bottom Line

Prepare for a multi-year infrastructure crunch where foundation models commoditize and value migrates to specialized applications, meaning builders should focus on vertical solutions rather than model infrastructure, while organizations should experiment with point solutions without betting on specific platform winners.

More from a16z Podcast

View all
The Rule for Picking AI Winners | The a16z Show
33:32
a16z Podcast a16z Podcast

The Rule for Picking AI Winners | The a16z Show

Frontier AI model companies are achieving hyperscaler-scale revenue growth with less than 5% economic diffusion, creating extraordinary value creation potential, yet rapid technological shifts and uncertain market structures make predicting ultimate winners increasingly difficult compared to prior tech cycles.

13 days ago · 10 points
Goldman Sachs Chairman on AI and the Future of Finance | The a16z Show
1:13:45
a16z Podcast a16z Podcast

Goldman Sachs Chairman on AI and the Future of Finance | The a16z Show

Former Goldman Sachs Chairman Lloyd Blankfein explains why modern risk management is about contingency planning rather than prediction, warns that AI's untestable leverage poses unprecedented financial dangers, and reflects on how his upbringing in Brooklyn public housing shaped a crisis-tested leadership philosophy.

30 days ago · 10 points
The Golden Age Thesis | Marc Andreessen on MTS
1:06:37
a16z Podcast a16z Podcast

The Golden Age Thesis | Marc Andreessen on MTS

Marc Andreessen argues that AI is ushering in a golden age of productivity while warning that institutional corruption—exemplified by AI safety advocates inadvertently training models on doomer literature and advocacy groups allegedly funding the hate groups they claim to oppose—reveals how fear and false empathy often manufacture the very crises they purport to solve.

about 1 month ago · 8 points