We Asked Jeremy Grantham Why AI Won’t Boost Profits — and What It Will Do Instead
TL;DR
Legendary investor Jeremy Grantham argues that AI will ultimately become a commoditized cost of doing business rather than a driver of permanently higher corporate profits, while defending his reputation as a selective "perma bear" who believes mean reversion remains the dominant force in markets despite recent monopoly distortions.
🐻 The Making of a 'Perma Bear' 2 insights
Selective bullishness defines career
Grantham rejects the "perma bear" label by citing two decisive bullish calls: his 1982 recommendation to buy at 7x earnings and his March 2009 essay "Reinvesting When Terrified" published the day the S&P hit 666, urging investors to buy during the panic.
Differentiating crisis severity
He emphasizes reserving extreme language like "abandon ship" only for high-confidence warnings, such as his July 2008 letter that preceded a 50% crash in emerging markets, distinguishing these from ordinary valuation concerns.
📉 Mean Reversion and Monopolies 3 insights
Historical cycles govern returns
Grantham states that everything in markets mean reverts—from P/E ratios to sector performance—as abnormal profits attract competition and losses deter capital until equilibrium returns.
The Mag 7 monopoly anomaly
A handful of tech giants have temporarily escaped mean reversion through winner-take-all dynamics and uniquely lax antitrust enforcement since 2000, creating global price-setting monopolies that slow GDP growth despite boosting their own margins.
Concentration stifles growth
While monopoly profits surge for dominant firms, overall economic growth has actually slowed because increased inequality and reduced competition characteristic of monopoly power depress system-wide GDP expansion.
🤖 AI's Economic Reality 3 insights
Temporary competitive advantage only
Early AI adopters will enjoy wider profit margins initially, but this benefit will vanish as the technology becomes universal, transitioning from a competitive edge to a basic operational cost.
No lasting margin expansion
Grantham asserts AI will not raise aggregate corporate profit margins because once all competitors implement it, the technology merely becomes another cost of doing business with normalized returns on capital, similar to how mini-computers became standard in asset management.
Massive uncertainty remains
Unlike previous technologies, AI generates vast disagreement even among Nobel laureates about whether it will create utopia or existential risk, making its ultimate economic impact impossible to predict with confidence.
⚔️ Market Structure and Mindset 2 insights
Brutal competition ahead
Grantham warns that markets are transitioning from a monopoly world to one of "brutal competition" where aggressive, cash-rich tech giants are heading "into each other's teeth," predicting "blood in the streets" as they battle for dominance.
Fight human cognitive biases
He advises investors to consciously combat humanity's tendencies to ignore unpleasant news and avoid long-term thinking, which are hardwired behavioral traps that lead to poor investment decisions.
Bottom Line
Treat AI as a commoditizing cost of business that will not sustain elevated profit margins, while preparing for intensifying competition to erode the monopoly advantages that have temporarily distorted market returns.
More from Excess Returns
View all
He Studied 250 Years of Market History | Meb Faber on Why America Won — And If It Can Last
Meb Faber discusses his new book 'Investing in America,' arguing that U.S. market dominance stems from a unique cultural foundation of ownership dating back to colonial joint stock companies, while presenting data showing stocks become less volatile than bonds over 20-year periods and remain the most reliable engine for long-term wealth creation.
Labor Market Cracks, Wild Fed Credibility Data and Semis Running Out of Pie | Last Call
The video analyzes SpaceX's volatile IPO through the lens of complex index flow dynamics, while macro strategist Andy Constant presents his 'Fab Five Freddy' thesis arguing that semiconductor equipment manufacturers are the next critical bottleneck in the AI supply chain as the industry faces oversubscribed earnings expectations against finite GDP growth.
The $400 Billion Gap | Warren Pies on Token Panic, a Trapped Fed and What Murders Bull Markets
Warren Pies explains why the Fed is trapped between runaway tech capex driving inflation and a deteriorating housing market, while arguing that AI's greatest existential risk is regulatory backlash rather than technological limits.
He Reverse-Engineered Why Amazon Won | Ritavan on Why the Moat Is the Wrong Test
The concept of economic "moats" is a static checklist that fails when business paradigms shift; investors should instead hunt for "system gambits," where companies sacrifice current performance to change the game entirely, building structural advantages that compound irreversibly in new systems.