We Asked Jeremy Grantham Why AI Won’t Boost Profits — and What It Will Do Instead
TL;DR
Legendary investor Jeremy Grantham argues that AI will ultimately become a commoditized cost of doing business rather than a driver of permanently higher corporate profits, while defending his reputation as a selective "perma bear" who believes mean reversion remains the dominant force in markets despite recent monopoly distortions.
🐻 The Making of a 'Perma Bear' 2 insights
Selective bullishness defines career
Grantham rejects the "perma bear" label by citing two decisive bullish calls: his 1982 recommendation to buy at 7x earnings and his March 2009 essay "Reinvesting When Terrified" published the day the S&P hit 666, urging investors to buy during the panic.
Differentiating crisis severity
He emphasizes reserving extreme language like "abandon ship" only for high-confidence warnings, such as his July 2008 letter that preceded a 50% crash in emerging markets, distinguishing these from ordinary valuation concerns.
📉 Mean Reversion and Monopolies 3 insights
Historical cycles govern returns
Grantham states that everything in markets mean reverts—from P/E ratios to sector performance—as abnormal profits attract competition and losses deter capital until equilibrium returns.
The Mag 7 monopoly anomaly
A handful of tech giants have temporarily escaped mean reversion through winner-take-all dynamics and uniquely lax antitrust enforcement since 2000, creating global price-setting monopolies that slow GDP growth despite boosting their own margins.
Concentration stifles growth
While monopoly profits surge for dominant firms, overall economic growth has actually slowed because increased inequality and reduced competition characteristic of monopoly power depress system-wide GDP expansion.
🤖 AI's Economic Reality 3 insights
Temporary competitive advantage only
Early AI adopters will enjoy wider profit margins initially, but this benefit will vanish as the technology becomes universal, transitioning from a competitive edge to a basic operational cost.
No lasting margin expansion
Grantham asserts AI will not raise aggregate corporate profit margins because once all competitors implement it, the technology merely becomes another cost of doing business with normalized returns on capital, similar to how mini-computers became standard in asset management.
Massive uncertainty remains
Unlike previous technologies, AI generates vast disagreement even among Nobel laureates about whether it will create utopia or existential risk, making its ultimate economic impact impossible to predict with confidence.
⚔️ Market Structure and Mindset 2 insights
Brutal competition ahead
Grantham warns that markets are transitioning from a monopoly world to one of "brutal competition" where aggressive, cash-rich tech giants are heading "into each other's teeth," predicting "blood in the streets" as they battle for dominance.
Fight human cognitive biases
He advises investors to consciously combat humanity's tendencies to ignore unpleasant news and avoid long-term thinking, which are hardwired behavioral traps that lead to poor investment decisions.
Bottom Line
Treat AI as a commoditizing cost of business that will not sustain elevated profit margins, while preparing for intensifying competition to erode the monopoly advantages that have temporarily distorted market returns.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked Ben Carlson How an 86% Crash Still Led to 8% Annual Returns
Financial expert Ben Carlson explains that successful long-term investing requires accepting unavoidable risk, resisting action bias during volatility, and understanding that even an 86% crash in 1929 couldn't prevent 8% annual returns for patient investors who avoided panic selling.
He Predicted the AI Bubble in 2023 | Doug Clinton and Gene Munster on Why We're Still in 1996
Deep Water Asset Management's Doug Clinton and Gene Munster argue AI remains in its 1996-era infancy with years of growth ahead before any bubble peak, as enterprise adoption explodes with coding agents driving unprecedented demand while threatening severe short-term disruption to knowledge workers who fail to adapt.
He Invested Through Five Bubbles. He Wrote the Book on Them | What We Learned This Week
Legendary bubble investor Jeremy Grantham and macro strategist Andy Constant join the podcast to explain why mega-cap tech has defied historical mean reversion through regulatory tolerance of monopolies, while detailing the three-phase lifecycle of financial bubbles from innovation through escalation to peak.
We Asked Marc Rubinstein What Happens When the 16-Year Credit Cycle Finally Turns
Marc Rubinstein argues that while the Fed downplays private credit redemption risks, the sector's explosive growth—fueled by post-2008 regulatory arbitrage—has created dangerous liquidity mismatches for retail investors and hidden leverage throughout the financial system, exemplified by the Blue Owl gate crisis and the HSBC-Atlas-MFS 'layer cake' failure.