We Asked Ben Carlson How an 86% Crash Still Led to 8% Annual Returns
TL;DR
Financial expert Ben Carlson explains that successful long-term investing requires accepting unavoidable risk, resisting action bias during volatility, and understanding that even an 86% crash in 1929 couldn't prevent 8% annual returns for patient investors who avoided panic selling.
🛡️ Redefining Risk 3 insights
Risk is unavoidable regardless of stance
As Carl Richards notes, risk is what remains after you've thought of everything—whether you bury cash, buy bonds, or invest aggressively, some uncertainty always persists.
Investors focus on sensational over statistical risks
People obsess over shark-attack-style risks like geopolitical crises while ignoring mosquito-style dangers like financial panics, despite the latter being what actually appear on long-term charts.
Markets bottom before economic headlines improve
Markets bottomed in October 2022 at 8% inflation, proving that waiting for positive headlines means missing the recovery, as stocks move before earnings or unemployment data peaks.
🧘 The Power of Inaction 3 insights
1929 crash still yielded 8% annual returns
Investing at the September 1929 peak meant suffering an 86% crash immediately and continued volatility through WWII, yet still produced roughly 8% annual returns over the long run.
Inaction often outperforms professional strategies
Chris Davis's mother outperformed his firm's active strategies by simply holding individual stocks for decades without trading, illustrating that doing nothing is often the hardest but most profitable work.
Action bias drives unnecessary trading
Like soccer goalies who dive 95% of the time despite data showing staying center improves save rates, investors trade to avoid looking idle even when inaction produces better results.
⚙️ Inflation and Decision Architecture 2 insights
Personal inflation varies from government averages
Carlson frames inflation as a personal finance problem rather than an investing one, noting that individual living costs vary widely and hedges like gold are unreliable compared to fixed-rate mortgages and stable employment.
ETF explosion requires systematic investment filters
With thousands of new ETFs and AI-generated strategies creating a fire hose of options, successful investing now depends on having strict filters to limit decisions rather than trying to time markets perfectly.
Bottom Line
Build a simple, automated investment system that filters out noise and removes the temptation to react to headlines, because doing nothing during crashes historically outperforms active intervention.
More from Excess Returns
View all
He Studied 250 Years of Market History | Meb Faber on Why America Won — And If It Can Last
Meb Faber discusses his new book 'Investing in America,' arguing that U.S. market dominance stems from a unique cultural foundation of ownership dating back to colonial joint stock companies, while presenting data showing stocks become less volatile than bonds over 20-year periods and remain the most reliable engine for long-term wealth creation.
Labor Market Cracks, Wild Fed Credibility Data and Semis Running Out of Pie | Last Call
The video analyzes SpaceX's volatile IPO through the lens of complex index flow dynamics, while macro strategist Andy Constant presents his 'Fab Five Freddy' thesis arguing that semiconductor equipment manufacturers are the next critical bottleneck in the AI supply chain as the industry faces oversubscribed earnings expectations against finite GDP growth.
The $400 Billion Gap | Warren Pies on Token Panic, a Trapped Fed and What Murders Bull Markets
Warren Pies explains why the Fed is trapped between runaway tech capex driving inflation and a deteriorating housing market, while arguing that AI's greatest existential risk is regulatory backlash rather than technological limits.
He Reverse-Engineered Why Amazon Won | Ritavan on Why the Moat Is the Wrong Test
The concept of economic "moats" is a static checklist that fails when business paradigms shift; investors should instead hunt for "system gambits," where companies sacrifice current performance to change the game entirely, building structural advantages that compound irreversibly in new systems.