We Asked Ben Carlson How an 86% Crash Still Led to 8% Annual Returns
TL;DR
Financial expert Ben Carlson explains that successful long-term investing requires accepting unavoidable risk, resisting action bias during volatility, and understanding that even an 86% crash in 1929 couldn't prevent 8% annual returns for patient investors who avoided panic selling.
🛡️ Redefining Risk 3 insights
Risk is unavoidable regardless of stance
As Carl Richards notes, risk is what remains after you've thought of everything—whether you bury cash, buy bonds, or invest aggressively, some uncertainty always persists.
Investors focus on sensational over statistical risks
People obsess over shark-attack-style risks like geopolitical crises while ignoring mosquito-style dangers like financial panics, despite the latter being what actually appear on long-term charts.
Markets bottom before economic headlines improve
Markets bottomed in October 2022 at 8% inflation, proving that waiting for positive headlines means missing the recovery, as stocks move before earnings or unemployment data peaks.
🧘 The Power of Inaction 3 insights
1929 crash still yielded 8% annual returns
Investing at the September 1929 peak meant suffering an 86% crash immediately and continued volatility through WWII, yet still produced roughly 8% annual returns over the long run.
Inaction often outperforms professional strategies
Chris Davis's mother outperformed his firm's active strategies by simply holding individual stocks for decades without trading, illustrating that doing nothing is often the hardest but most profitable work.
Action bias drives unnecessary trading
Like soccer goalies who dive 95% of the time despite data showing staying center improves save rates, investors trade to avoid looking idle even when inaction produces better results.
⚙️ Inflation and Decision Architecture 2 insights
Personal inflation varies from government averages
Carlson frames inflation as a personal finance problem rather than an investing one, noting that individual living costs vary widely and hedges like gold are unreliable compared to fixed-rate mortgages and stable employment.
ETF explosion requires systematic investment filters
With thousands of new ETFs and AI-generated strategies creating a fire hose of options, successful investing now depends on having strict filters to limit decisions rather than trying to time markets perfectly.
Bottom Line
Build a simple, automated investment system that filters out noise and removes the temptation to react to headlines, because doing nothing during crashes historically outperforms active intervention.
More from Excess Returns
View all
He Predicted the AI Bubble in 2023 | Doug Clinton and Gene Munster on Why We're Still in 1996
Deep Water Asset Management's Doug Clinton and Gene Munster argue AI remains in its 1996-era infancy with years of growth ahead before any bubble peak, as enterprise adoption explodes with coding agents driving unprecedented demand while threatening severe short-term disruption to knowledge workers who fail to adapt.
He Invested Through Five Bubbles. He Wrote the Book on Them | What We Learned This Week
Legendary bubble investor Jeremy Grantham and macro strategist Andy Constant join the podcast to explain why mega-cap tech has defied historical mean reversion through regulatory tolerance of monopolies, while detailing the three-phase lifecycle of financial bubbles from innovation through escalation to peak.
We Asked Jeremy Grantham Why AI Won’t Boost Profits — and What It Will Do Instead
Legendary investor Jeremy Grantham argues that AI will ultimately become a commoditized cost of doing business rather than a driver of permanently higher corporate profits, while defending his reputation as a selective "perma bear" who believes mean reversion remains the dominant force in markets despite recent monopoly distortions.
We Asked Marc Rubinstein What Happens When the 16-Year Credit Cycle Finally Turns
Marc Rubinstein argues that while the Fed downplays private credit redemption risks, the sector's explosive growth—fueled by post-2008 regulatory arbitrage—has created dangerous liquidity mismatches for retail investors and hidden leverage throughout the financial system, exemplified by the Blue Owl gate crisis and the HSBC-Atlas-MFS 'layer cake' failure.