This Is How The Next Great Depression Starts Warns Economist | George Selgin
TL;DR
Economist George Selgin argues the Great Depression required a catastrophic convergence of banking collapses, gold standard failures, and protectionist tariffs—a 'perfect storm' unlikely to repeat today due to stronger financial safeguards and learned policy lessons, though current regime uncertainty and oil-driven inflation pose serious stagflation risks.
🏛️ The Perfect Storm of the 1930s 3 insights
Fragile gold standard unraveling
The interwar gold standard was designed to economize on gold but collapsed when international cooperation broke down in the late 1920s, triggering a global contraction in money supplies and credit.
US banking system collapse
The weak pre-FDIC system saw thousands of banks fail annually throughout the 1920s, accelerating dramatically after the 1929 crash and compounding the monetary contraction.
Tariffs aggravated existing crises
While Smoot-Hawley and retaliatory tariffs worsened the downturn, they aggravated existing monetary and banking failures rather than single-handedly causing the depression.
📈 What Actually Ended the Depression 3 insights
New Deal programs largely failed
The National Recovery Administration's price-fixing cartels worsened unemployment, and the Federal Reserve failed to offset monetary collapse during the 1930s.
WWII provided only temporary relief
Military enlistment and war production temporarily masked unemployment, but experts feared the depression would return when troops demobilized and defense orders dried up in 1945.
Post-war private investment boom
Real recovery began when regime uncertainty ended, anti-business policies were repealed, and private investment 'took off like a rocket' after 1945 without massive fiscal stimulus.
⚠️ Modern Economic Risks 3 insights
Regime uncertainty suppresses growth
Current tariff wars and geopolitical conflict in Iran create policy uncertainty that drags on hiring and investment, mirroring the New Deal era's business hesitation.
Oil shocks threaten stagflation
With oil near $100 per barrel and potential Strait of Hormuz closures, inflation will likely exceed the Fed's 2% target through supply constraints that monetary policy cannot easily fix.
Fed faces impossible trade-off
Attempting to fight supply-driven inflation through rate hikes could easily trigger recession, repeating the Federal Reserve's error during the 2008 oil shock.
Bottom Line
Sustainable recovery requires stable policies that encourage private investment rather than aggressive government intervention, while the Federal Reserve must avoid triggering recession by tightening into supply-driven inflation caused by oil shocks.
More from The David Lin Report
View all
100% Upside In This Asset As Supply Chains Break Down | Nomi Prins
Former Wall Street analyst Nomi Prins argues that supply chain disruptions from the Iran war and structural shortages in critical minerals are creating significant upside opportunities in copper and silver, while central bank interventions continue to create 'permanent distortions' that prop up equity markets despite geopolitical crises.
Market ‘Exuberance Going To Die’; Investor Called This Pullback | Ran Neuner
CryptoBanter founder Ran Neuner argues Bitcoin may have invalidated its traditional 4-year bear cycle on May 5th by breaking above key technical resistance, driven by extreme equity market exuberance and Michael Saylor's STRC dividend mechanism creating perpetual buying pressure.
Stocks Could Go ‘Absolutely Ludicrous’ Before The Next Correction | Chris Vermeulen
Chief market strategist Chris Vermeulen analyzes the current rotation from tech stocks into broad market sectors while maintaining long positions since April, emphasizing systematic risk management using trailing stops and technical signals to exit before a potential sharp 30-40% correction.
Short Stocks Now...Or Wait? Market Wizard’s Jack Schwager: 'Dangerous Level' Here
Legendary trading author Jack Schwager analyzes the S&P 500's record rally, explaining why he remains technically bullish but with extreme caution due to historically high valuations and potential exhaustion levels near 7850, emphasizing tight risk management over market predictions.