The Doomsday AI Article That Sparked a Panic | Last Call

| Stock Investing | February 28, 2026 | 3.8 Thousand views | 1:09:45

TL;DR

Hosts Matt and Jack, along with options strategist Brent Kachuba, analyze the market panic sparked by a viral AI doomsday article (the 'Catrini piece'), explaining why this 'manufactured story from the future' served as a contrarian sentiment indicator for software stocks while emphasizing the need for probabilistic scenario planning over binary AI predictions.

📉 The Viral AI Doomsday Narrative 3 insights

Fiction treated as forecast

The 'Catrini' article explicitly labeled itself as a 'manufactured story from the future' and science fiction bear case exercise, yet triggered formal responses from Fed Governor Waller, Citadel, and Jeremy Seagull.

Article marked a potential bottom

The piece published precisely as software stocks (IGV) hit key technical support levels, suggesting the narrative panic may have marked a local sentiment extreme rather than the start of a crash.

Range-bound market reality

Despite the doomsday narrative, the S&P 500 has traded sideways between 6,800-7,000 for months with no actual fear-driven put buying detected in options data.

📊 Options Market Insights 3 insights

Put/call ratio contrarian signal

Viral charts highlighting extreme put/call ratios in software stocks actually coincided with historical market bottoms, not tops, indicating capitulation rather than impending doom.

Differentiation within software

Options pricing reveals a bifurcated market where names like Adobe and Autodesk show varying volatility profiles, contradicting the idea of blanket AI-driven software destruction.

Corporate buybacks contradict doom

Salesforce announced a $50 billion buyback program, suggesting major software companies do not view AI as an immediate existential threat requiring defensive cash hoarding.

🎯 Framework for AI Uncertainty 3 insights

Probabilistic scenario planning

Investors must map multiple base, bull, and bear cases rather than betting on single outcomes, as AI represents unprecedented uncertainty regarding labor replacement versus enhancement.

Inflationary buildout, disinflationary outcome

Current AI infrastructure spending creates near-term inflationary pressure, but successful deployment could trigger long-term 'Ghost GDP' deflation as productivity potentially soars.

Risk means more things can happen

Extreme bear cases serve as valuable stress tests for portfolio construction but should not drive tactical positioning given the wide distribution of potential AI outcomes.

Bottom Line

Use extreme AI doomsday scenarios as risk management tools to stress-test portfolio resilience, but maintain exposure across a range of probabilistic outcomes rather than positioning for binary predictions.

More from Excess Returns

View all
We Asked Jim Paulsen What Happens When 87% of the Economy Can No Longer Be Ignored
54:38
Excess Returns Excess Returns

We Asked Jim Paulsen What Happens When 87% of the Economy Can No Longer Be Ignored

Jim Paulsen argues that policy officials are fixated on inflation and the tech sector while ignoring a weak '90% of the economy' nearing stall speed. He predicts the Fed will be forced to pivot toward easing this year as growth concerns overtake inflation fears, driving a rotation from mega-cap tech into small caps, value, and international equities while bond yields fall.

3 days ago · 9 points