We Asked Jim Paulsen What Happens When 87% of the Economy Can No Longer Be Ignored
TL;DR
Jim Paulsen argues that policy officials are fixated on inflation and the tech sector while ignoring a weak '90% of the economy' nearing stall speed. He predicts the Fed will be forced to pivot toward easing this year as growth concerns overtake inflation fears, driving a rotation from mega-cap tech into small caps, value, and international equities while bond yields fall.
⚖️ The 'Bust Boom' Economic Reality 3 insights
90% of the economy is being ignored
While markets obsess over AI and the Magnificent Seven, approximately 87-90% of the U.S. economy is weak and growing near stall speed, creating a bifurcated 'bust booming' environment.
Policy stimulation is urgently needed
Paulsen believes both monetary and fiscal authorities will need to inject 'policy juice' to prevent the weak majority of the economy from dragging the aggregate into recession.
Recession odds have increased slightly
While he maintains that a recession remains unlikely, Paulsen notes the probability has risen over the past 60 days due to sustained economic weakness and geopolitical pressures.
📉 Fed Policy & Inflation Dynamics 3 insights
The 1970s inflation comparison is flawed
Unlike the 1970s when surging labor force growth created excess demand, today's inflation stems from supply constraints with labor force growth below 1%, making demand-slowing policies inappropriate.
Fed will be forced to cut rates
Paulsen predicts the central bank will pivot to easing this year not by choice, but because economic weakness will 'wag the dog' and force officials to prioritize growth over inflation fighting.
Bond yields headed lower
He maintains a constructive outlook on bonds, expecting yields to decline as growth concerns overtake inflation obsession and policy easing commences.
🔄 Geopolitics & Market Rotation 3 insights
Oil prices are divorced from Fed policy
Paulsen argues crude will not decline until the Iran conflict resolves or the Strait of Hormuz reopens, and Fed rate hikes have no bearing on supply-driven energy prices.
Tech leadership hinges on policy tightness
Mega-cap tech outperforms when policy is tight or paused, but underperforms during easing; conversely, small caps, value, and international stocks require monetary/fiscal stimulus to lead.
Investors are complacent and overweight
Current sentiment reflects reluctant compliance, with investors knowingly overweight tech but unwilling to rotate until a definitive breakdown occurs, setting up potential forced selling.
Bottom Line
Prepare for a policy pivot from inflation fighting to growth stimulation by rotating exposure from mega-cap tech into small caps, cyclical value, and international equities while maintaining duration in fixed income.
More from Excess Returns
View all
Expensive Market. Record Issuance. Can the Story Still Hold It Up? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, IPO strategist Andy Constan, and value investor Tobias Carlisle discuss how to value story-driven companies like SpaceX, why issuers intentionally underprice IPOs, and why investors should avoid market timing despite extreme overvaluation by targeting undervalued segments like small-cap value.
The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees
Tobias Carlisle warns that the market is at historic valuation extremes comparable to the dot-com bubble, but argues investors should rotate into deeply undervalued small and micro-cap value stocks rather than exit entirely, as early indicators suggest a potential decade-long rotation away from large-cap growth; meanwhile, he cautions that the massive AI infrastructure buildout risks following historical boom-bust patterns where value accrues to consumers, not creators.
The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth
Finance professor Aswath Damodaran analyzes SpaceX's $2.7 trillion valuation, finding that while the space launch and Starlink businesses hold real competitive advantages, the AI division's projected $26 trillion market relies on terrible unit economics and a contradictory strategy of renting data centers to direct competitors.
The $700 Billion Shift | Andy Constan on What Happens When Buybacks Turn into Issuance
Andy Constan explains the historic shift from share buybacks to net equity issuance—a $600-700 billion reversal driven by AI infrastructure spending—while analyzing why SpaceX's record-breaking IPO succeeded by balancing the conflicting interests of issuers, employees, and underwriters.