The Apocalypse That Isn’t Coming | Larry Swedroe Busts Private Credit Myths
TL;DR
Larry Swedroe argues that private credit is fundamentally misunderstood by the media, presenting lower systemic risk than portrayed when investors focus on senior secured, highly diversified structures rather than concentrated BDCs, and that illiquidity offers a 'near free lunch' premium for those with accurately assessed liquidity needs.
📈 Evolution and Scale of Private Credit 3 insights
**Post-2008 market explosion**
Private credit grew from a niche to nearly $2 trillion as bank regulations tightened after 2008, forcing mid-market companies to seek alternative financing with greater speed and flexibility than traditional bank committees allow.
**Shift to interval fund structures**
Originally restricted to institutions like Harvard and Yale, private credit became accessible to individual investors through vehicles like Cliffwater's interval fund, which guarantees 5% quarterly liquidity versus legacy draw-down structures.
**The illiquidity premium**
Companies pay 1.5% to 5% extra in yield for certainty and speed, creating excess returns for investors who can accurately match these less liquid assets to their actual spending needs.
⚠️ Three Critical Risk Factors 3 insights
**Illiquidity as 'near free lunch'**
Most high-net-worth investors vastly overstate liquidity needs, as even 90-year-olds typically withdraw only ~10% annually (RMDs), making 20-30% allocations to private credit suitable for long-term wealth preservation.
**Senior secured credit advantage**
Unlike equity's unlimited upside, credit caps returns at yield while risking 100% loss, making senior secured loans with ~40% LTV and private equity sponsorship critical for narrowing the dispersion of outcomes.
**Concentration risk in BDCs**
Proprietary BDCs average 61% concentration in their top 25 loans versus 12% for open-architecture funds like Cliffwater that hold 4,000 loans across dozens of underwriting partners, providing the only true 'free lunch' in investing.
📰 Debunking Media Myths 3 insights
**Isolated losses overblown**
Media cited $60M losses at Cliffwater as catastrophic, but this represented only 18 basis points on $33B AUM—well below budgeted 60bps annual expectations and far from the '30 cents on the dollar' distressed pricing often claimed.
**Daily pricing transparency**
Contrary to claims of stale valuation, major funds mark daily using public market beta adjustments, with loans typically trading at 95-96 cents even when spreads widen significantly.
**False systemic risk comparisons**
Private credit lacks 2008-style contagion because non-bank lenders don't provide systemic liquidity to the economy, making this a 'far better situation' than bank-led crises that threaten the entire financial system.
🎯 Current Environment and Underwriting 3 insights
**Rate reset timeline**
Only ~5% of quality portfolios contain pre-2022 originations underwritten at near-zero rates, with post-2022 loans featuring tightened standards and higher all-in yields that better compensate for current risk levels.
**AI disruption exaggerated**
Media narratives predicting mass software business obsolescence from AI are overstated, as fundamental cash flow analysis remains sound for most sectors despite technological disruption fears.
**Expected loss budgeting**
Quality funds budget for 2% default rates with 70% recoveries (60bps annual losses), a manageable figure that historically allows private credit to far outperform public equities and high-yield bonds during serious recessions.
Bottom Line
Focus on open-architecture, senior secured private credit funds with extreme diversification rather than concentrated proprietary BDCs, accurately assess personal liquidity needs to capture the 1.5-5% illiquidity premium, and ignore media panic that conflates isolated credit losses with systemic crisis.
More from Excess Returns
View all
Easy Bubbles. Hard 100 Baggers. Useless AI | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Ben Inker and Chris Mayer join the hosts to discuss how to navigate different types of market bubbles based on risk-return dynamics, why vague labels like 'AI' obscure true business analysis, and how accounting mechanics for massive capital investments can create temporary earnings peaks that mask underlying valuations.
He Wrote the Book on 100-Baggers | Chris Mayer on SpaceX, AI Reckoning, and Why Early Is Overrated
Investor Chris Mayer warns that SpaceX's 145x revenue valuation and the current AI boom echo past bubbles, arguing that investors should resist the urge to buy early during hype cycles because truly great companies endure severe drawdowns and offer multiple entry points over time.
We Asked GMO’s Head of Asset Allocation Why This Bubble is Easy — But Investors Will Get it Wrong
GMO's Ben Inker argues the current AI-driven US stock bubble is "easy" to navigate because investors can rotate to fairly priced international assets while maintaining normal risk levels, unlike the "hard" bubbles of 2007 and 2021 when all risk assets were simultaneously overvalued.
Expensive Market. Record Issuance. Can the Story Still Hold It Up? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, IPO strategist Andy Constan, and value investor Tobias Carlisle discuss how to value story-driven companies like SpaceX, why issuers intentionally underprice IPOs, and why investors should avoid market timing despite extreme overvaluation by targeting undervalued segments like small-cap value.