Root Conditions. Escalation. Peak | Andy Constan on What Five Bubbles Taught Him About AI
TL;DR
Andy Constan argues that markets have entered the 'peaking phase' of an AI-driven bubble, drawing parallels to five historical bubbles he has experienced, emphasizing that while bubble regimes are identifiable through root conditions and escalation events, timing the exact peak remains impossible due to human nature and market mechanics.
💥 The Three Phases of Bubble Formation 3 insights
Root conditions create fertile ground
Major productivity shifts, regulatory changes, or technological breakthroughs—like the AI/ChatGPT moment in January 2023—establish the foundation for potential bubbles, though they don't guarantee one will form.
Escalation events trigger parabolic moves
Specific catalysts transform favorable conditions into full bubble regimes, such as the Fed easing financial conditions during the March 2023 SVB banking crisis despite 62 months of above-target inflation.
Peaking phases can persist longer than expected
Even after warning signs appear, markets can rally significantly; the NASDAQ surged 60% in the six months following the October 1998 LTCM bailout before reaching its ultimate 2000 peak.
📉 Historical Parallels and Mechanical Risks 3 insights
The 1987 crash was a bubble despite popular perception
Stocks gained 31% before the October crash and ended the year flat, driven by LBOs, financial deregulation, and portfolio insurance mechanics that accelerated both the ramp and the collapse.
Modern options activity echoes 1987 dangers
Zero days-to-expiration (0DTE) options today rhyme with portfolio insurance strategies that exacerbated the 1987 crash through mechanical selling dynamics.
Bond bubble followed COVID acceleration
Post-GFC zero interest rate policies created a bond bubble that went parabolic during the pandemic shutdown before resolving rapidly in the following year.
🧠 Human Nature and Market Reality 3 insights
FOMO is the engine of bubble regimes
Bubbles persist because human nature makes investors susceptible to envy when peers achieve sudden wealth through semiconductor or AI stocks, creating unsustainable behavior.
Markets are always in equilibrium
Constan rejects 'overbought' or 'oversold' concepts, arguing that at any moment, investors hold exactly what they want to hold, making price levels inherently neither expensive nor cheap.
The holy grail doesn't exist
Successfully timing bubble tops is impossible, and investors should default to passive, well-diversified portfolios rather than attempting to predict when regimes will shift.
Bottom Line
Investors should recognize the current AI bubble's peaking phase but avoid trying to time the top, instead maintaining passive diversification while acknowledging that human nature and mechanical market risks make bubbles unpredictable and dangerous to short prematurely.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked a Renowned Financial Historian What Investors Get Wrong About Bubbles
Financial historian Edward Chancellor explains that historical technology booms from railroads to the dot-com era follow a predictable capital cycle pattern: massive overinvestment driven by competitive 'fear of missing out' leads to fragmented markets and destroyed profits, even when the underlying technology proves transformative for society.
The S&P 500 is Just 46 Stocks. 89% of the Economy is Flatlining | What We Learned This Week
Top stock pickers succeed with just a 49% hit rate where outlier magnitude drives returns, while current inflation differs structurally from the 1970s due to weak labor force growth creating a disinflationary environment rather than demand-driven price spirals.
We Asked an Options Expert Why War and Oil Haven’t Broken This Market — and Which Signal Could
Options expert Brent explains why escalating Middle East tensions and $115 oil haven't derailed the market's AI-driven meltup, citing record call option volumes, the removal of pattern day trading rules, and the market's willingness to ignore short-term macro risks for long-term capex growth.
We Asked a $4.5B Quant Manager Why the S&P 500 Is Just 46 Stocks — and Why Small Caps Aren't Dead
A Bridgeway quant manager reveals that only 46 S&P 500 stocks currently drive index returns, while new research shows that filtering for persistently small companies (not just current small-cap status) revives the size premium, and explains why multifactor strategies with rigorous human oversight outperform single-factor smart beta approaches.