Root Conditions. Escalation. Peak | Andy Constan on What Five Bubbles Taught Him About AI
TL;DR
Andy Constan argues that markets have entered the 'peaking phase' of an AI-driven bubble, drawing parallels to five historical bubbles he has experienced, emphasizing that while bubble regimes are identifiable through root conditions and escalation events, timing the exact peak remains impossible due to human nature and market mechanics.
💥 The Three Phases of Bubble Formation 3 insights
Root conditions create fertile ground
Major productivity shifts, regulatory changes, or technological breakthroughs—like the AI/ChatGPT moment in January 2023—establish the foundation for potential bubbles, though they don't guarantee one will form.
Escalation events trigger parabolic moves
Specific catalysts transform favorable conditions into full bubble regimes, such as the Fed easing financial conditions during the March 2023 SVB banking crisis despite 62 months of above-target inflation.
Peaking phases can persist longer than expected
Even after warning signs appear, markets can rally significantly; the NASDAQ surged 60% in the six months following the October 1998 LTCM bailout before reaching its ultimate 2000 peak.
📉 Historical Parallels and Mechanical Risks 3 insights
The 1987 crash was a bubble despite popular perception
Stocks gained 31% before the October crash and ended the year flat, driven by LBOs, financial deregulation, and portfolio insurance mechanics that accelerated both the ramp and the collapse.
Modern options activity echoes 1987 dangers
Zero days-to-expiration (0DTE) options today rhyme with portfolio insurance strategies that exacerbated the 1987 crash through mechanical selling dynamics.
Bond bubble followed COVID acceleration
Post-GFC zero interest rate policies created a bond bubble that went parabolic during the pandemic shutdown before resolving rapidly in the following year.
🧠 Human Nature and Market Reality 3 insights
FOMO is the engine of bubble regimes
Bubbles persist because human nature makes investors susceptible to envy when peers achieve sudden wealth through semiconductor or AI stocks, creating unsustainable behavior.
Markets are always in equilibrium
Constan rejects 'overbought' or 'oversold' concepts, arguing that at any moment, investors hold exactly what they want to hold, making price levels inherently neither expensive nor cheap.
The holy grail doesn't exist
Successfully timing bubble tops is impossible, and investors should default to passive, well-diversified portfolios rather than attempting to predict when regimes will shift.
Bottom Line
Investors should recognize the current AI bubble's peaking phase but avoid trying to time the top, instead maintaining passive diversification while acknowledging that human nature and mechanical market risks make bubbles unpredictable and dangerous to short prematurely.
More from Excess Returns
View all
Easy Bubbles. Hard 100 Baggers. Useless AI | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Ben Inker and Chris Mayer join the hosts to discuss how to navigate different types of market bubbles based on risk-return dynamics, why vague labels like 'AI' obscure true business analysis, and how accounting mechanics for massive capital investments can create temporary earnings peaks that mask underlying valuations.
He Wrote the Book on 100-Baggers | Chris Mayer on SpaceX, AI Reckoning, and Why Early Is Overrated
Investor Chris Mayer warns that SpaceX's 145x revenue valuation and the current AI boom echo past bubbles, arguing that investors should resist the urge to buy early during hype cycles because truly great companies endure severe drawdowns and offer multiple entry points over time.
We Asked GMO’s Head of Asset Allocation Why This Bubble is Easy — But Investors Will Get it Wrong
GMO's Ben Inker argues the current AI-driven US stock bubble is "easy" to navigate because investors can rotate to fairly priced international assets while maintaining normal risk levels, unlike the "hard" bubbles of 2007 and 2021 when all risk assets were simultaneously overvalued.
Expensive Market. Record Issuance. Can the Story Still Hold It Up? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, IPO strategist Andy Constan, and value investor Tobias Carlisle discuss how to value story-driven companies like SpaceX, why issuers intentionally underprice IPOs, and why investors should avoid market timing despite extreme overvaluation by targeting undervalued segments like small-cap value.