The $1 Trillion Supercycle AI is Hiding | Joseph Shaposhnik on the Opportunity Investors Are Missing
TL;DR
Joseph Shaposhnik reveals a $1 trillion NATO defense spending supercycle hidden behind AI headlines, while advocating for 'picks and shovels' AI infrastructure plays over hyperscalers and a rotation from the Magnificent 7 into the overlooked S&P 493.
🛡️ The Trillion-Dollar Defense Supercycle 3 insights
NATO's $1 Trillion Spending Wave
NATO countries are projected to increase defense expenditures by $1 trillion over the next decade to meet alliance targets, creating a structural growth tailwind for aerospace and defense contractors regardless of specific conflict durations.
Ignoring the Headline Noise
Geopolitical headlines are inherently short-term and typically fade without meaningful long-term impact, reinforcing the importance of focusing on recurring revenue businesses with durable franchises that can compound through macro shocks.
Crisis Assessment Process
When shocks occur, Shaposhnik evaluates whether long-term free cash flow compounding power is permanently impaired, builds position-sizing buffers for extended conflicts, and generally finds that less portfolio activity during volatile periods produces better returns.
🤖 AI Infrastructure: Avoid the Winners, Buy the Suppliers 4 insights
Supplying the Gold Rush
Rather than predicting which LLM or hyperscaler will dominate, Shaposhnik prefers investing in semiconductor and connector suppliers that serve multiple ecosystem players, avoiding the binary risk of betting on a single winner.
Hyperscalers Lose Capital-Light Advantage
Microsoft confirmed that capital expenditure growth will outpace cloud revenue growth for the foreseeable future, signaling that hyperscalers have transformed from capital-light compounders into capital-intensive utility-like infrastructure builders.
Single LLM Concentration Risk
Microsoft's heavy reliance on OpenAI prompted Shaposhnik to remove it from his top-five holdings after a decade, citing the risk that hundreds of billions in capex could be stranded if their chosen LLM loses the AI race.
Software Moat Uncertainty
AI threatens to disrupt traditional software business models while simultaneously enabling development efficiency, creating significant uncertainty about whether the sector maintains its historical status as the highest-quality business model.
📈 Rotation to the Forgotten 493 2 insights
2026: Year of the 493
Extreme concentration in the Magnificent 7 created historic valuation divergences, positioning 2026 as a potential rotation year where the remaining S&P 493 outperforms—similar to the 2000-2002 shift from tech to traditional businesses.
Quality in the Neglected Names
Many durable non-technology businesses within the 493 have been left behind despite solid operational performance, offering compelling opportunities as market leadership broadens beyond AI-focused mega-caps.
Bottom Line
Focus investments on AI infrastructure suppliers serving multiple hyperscalers rather than picking winners, overweight the underappreciated defense supercycle, and rotate capital toward quality businesses outside the Magnificent 7.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked GMO’s Head of Asset Allocation Why This Bubble is Easy — But Investors Will Get it Wrong
GMO's Ben Inker argues the current AI-driven US stock bubble is "easy" to navigate because investors can rotate to fairly priced international assets while maintaining normal risk levels, unlike the "hard" bubbles of 2007 and 2021 when all risk assets were simultaneously overvalued.
Expensive Market. Record Issuance. Can the Story Still Hold It Up? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, IPO strategist Andy Constan, and value investor Tobias Carlisle discuss how to value story-driven companies like SpaceX, why issuers intentionally underprice IPOs, and why investors should avoid market timing despite extreme overvaluation by targeting undervalued segments like small-cap value.
The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees
Tobias Carlisle warns that the market is at historic valuation extremes comparable to the dot-com bubble, but argues investors should rotate into deeply undervalued small and micro-cap value stocks rather than exit entirely, as early indicators suggest a potential decade-long rotation away from large-cap growth; meanwhile, he cautions that the massive AI infrastructure buildout risks following historical boom-bust patterns where value accrues to consumers, not creators.
The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth
Finance professor Aswath Damodaran analyzes SpaceX's $2.7 trillion valuation, finding that while the space launch and Starlink businesses hold real competitive advantages, the AI division's projected $26 trillion market relies on terrible unit economics and a contradictory strategy of renting data centers to direct competitors.