Tekedra Mawakana, Co-CEO of Waymo: Building a Safer Way Home
TL;DR
Waymo Co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana discusses her journey from Mississippi to leading autonomous vehicle technology, emphasizing that transformative innovation requires betting on terrifying opportunities while building safety-first cultures that aim for a 13x improvement over human drivers rather than settling for 'safe enough'.
🌱 Southern Roots & Career Foundations 3 insights
Rural upbringing shaped foundational ambition
Growing up between Mississippi farmland and suburban Virginia instilled the value of community, understanding resource origins, and the confidence that she possessed all ingredients needed to build anything.
Law school as optionality strategy
She chose Columbia Law over business school to avoid premature specialization, viewing legal education as a versatile toolkit for navigating emerging regulatory frameworks during the 1996 internet boom.
Early tech era built adaptability muscle
Working at AOL, Yahoo, and eBay during the internet's regulatory formation taught her to apply public policy discipline to shepherd ideas from concept to commercialization.
🚀 Taking the Waymo Bet 3 insights
Terror as a compass for growth
She joined Waymo in 2017 despite having no guarantee of scale success, guided by the mantra 'if it doesn't terrify you, it's probably not worth it' and a desire to move from career certainty to genuine moonshot building.
From global teams to team of one
The transition required abandoning compensation clarity and leading five-continent teams to embrace an abundance mindset focused solely on solving humanity's transportation challenges.
Trust the whisper of preparation
Her advice for unproven career moves is to listen to the 'small voice' reminding you that your unique collection of victories and defeats has prepared you for this moment, despite louder doubts.
🛡️ Safety-First Leadership 3 insights
Safety cannot be retrofitted
Waymo embeds safety into software releases, reporting mechanisms, and decision-making from day one, modeling pauses and counter-progress choices to ensure they advance only safely, not for progress's sake.
'Safe enough' is insufficient standard
With 1.2 million global roadway deaths annually, Waymo targets a 13x reduction in serious injury crashes compared to human drivers, shifting the conversation from minimum thresholds to urgent life-saving.
Imperfection vs. safety distinction
She emphasizes educating the public that being safe doesn't mean being perfect, requiring difficult conversations about actual risk versus perceived incidents while maintaining operational transparency.
Bottom Line
Bet on yourself by trusting the quiet voice that affirms your preparation, and build organizations where safety is woven into cultural DNA from inception rather than added later.
More from My First Million
View all
"On Making Organizational Culture Great," with Professor Glenn Carroll
Professor Glenn Carroll argues that effective organizational culture isn't measured by employee happiness but by strategic alignment, where a 'strong culture' acts as infrastructure that enables decentralized decision-making, reduces managerial overhead, and allows employees to execute strategy automatically without constant oversight.
Ep78 “What’s Wrong With Taxing Billionaires More?” with Joshua Rauh
Finance professors from Stanford and Wharton argue that California's proposed 5% billionaire wealth tax would likely lose money for the state due to taxpayer flight, violates the implicit contracts that drive innovation, and ignores that the wealthy already pay the vast majority of income taxes while generating massive economic value.
A Conversation with faculty about Stanford GSB's People, Culture, and Performance Program
Stanford GSB's People, Culture, and Performance program teaches executives to treat human capital as a competitive advantage through a 5.5-day immersive experience that blends social science research with real-world Silicon Valley practices.
Our AI Future: From Abundance to Apocalypse
Stanford economist Chad Jones explores AI's economic potential through two divergent scenarios: explosive growth driven by recursive self-improvement and full automation, versus continued 2% annual growth constrained by historical patterns and persistent human bottlenecks in production chains.