[State of Research Funding] Beyond NSF, Slingshots, Open Frontiers — Andy Konwinski, Laude Institute
TL;DR
Andy Konwinski details the Laude Institute's dual-track model to revolutionize research funding by combining a nonprofit for open-source AI with a venture arm for PhD-led startups, aiming to replicate the 'Databricks Motion' where breakthrough research becomes billion-dollar companies through high-velocity, Silicon Valley-style capital deployment that complements underfunded NSF programs.
🏛️ The Laude Institute Architecture 3 insights
Dual-track funding model
The Institute operates a nonprofit for pre-incorporation open research and Laude Ventures for post-incorporation startups, unified by an obsession with 'shipping'—open source projects for the nonprofit and commercial products for the venture arm.
Researcher-led governance
Organization runs 'for researchers, by researchers' with 50+ top faculty (including Jeff Dean) and unicorn founders from Databricks and Perplexity serving as investment partners and advisors.
Right resource, right time
Structure targets the critical 'dotted line' of incorporation to provide resources exactly when researchers need them, bridging the gap between academic breakthrough and commercial application.
🚀 The Research-to-Unicorn Pipeline 3 insights
Multi-founder teams derisk startups
Large research teams with 7-8 co-founders (like Databricks, OpenAI, or VMware) reduce 'founder divorce risk' while proving ability to execute breakthroughs together before raising capital.
Replicating the Databricks Motion
Path follows NSF-funded research becoming open-source breakthroughs (like Apache Spark) that translate into hundred-billion-dollar companies, a model also seen in Perplexity, Anysphere, and Google.
New gold standard for VCs
Researcher-led startups have reached a tipping point where PhD founders are becoming the highest-leverage path from breakthrough to world-changing company, attracting top-tier venture interest.
🧠 Funding 'The Layer Above' Models 3 insights
Compound systems focus
Slingshots fund the 'layer above' base models—context management, agent tool use, memory curation, and prompt optimization—exemplified by DSPy/JEPA optimizers using evolutionary genetic techniques.
Post-training efficiency
Research targets continual learning methods that update model knowledge without full retraining (avoiding 10,000 GPU hours), analogous to human memory updating rather than brain rewiring.
Concrete funded projects
Specific initiatives include Terminal Bench (evaluation frameworks), Arena (comparison platforms), and research into compound AI systems that manage context and agent decisions.
💵 Complementing Traditional Funding 3 insights
NSF's critical funding gap
NSF's $1 billion annual computer science budget—facing potential cuts to half—is insufficient for frontier AI research, which requires $10-100 billion annually to compete globally.
Venture-style selection
Replaces traditional peer review with Silicon Valley 'picker' expertise to deploy capital faster, with stronger opinions narrowly focused on high-impact AI systems, cryptography, and architecture.
Geographic diversification
Expanding beyond Berkeley/Stanford to CMU, MIT, UIUC, University of Washington, and Canadian universities (Toronto, Waterloo, McGill) via PhD entrepreneurship clubs.
Bottom Line
Research funding must evolve beyond traditional grants to adopt high-velocity, venture-style selection of researcher-led teams working on open-source breakthroughs, creating a replicable pipeline from academic discovery to world-changing companies.
More from Latent Space
View all
The Agent Cloud: Databricks’ Bet on the Future of AI — Matei Zaharia and Reynold Xin
Matei Zaharia and Reynold Xin detail Databricks' open-source 'Agent Cloud' platform (Omnigen), arguing that standardized protocols and persistent infrastructure—not just better models—will determine which enterprises successfully deploy collaborative, secure AI agents at scale.
AI Security After Codex and Claude Code — Zico Kolter & Matt Fredrikson, Gray Swan
Gray Swan co-founders Zico Kolter and Matt Fredrikson explain why AI systems require a fundamentally different security approach than traditional software, highlighting how their automated red teaming system 'Shade' has begun to outperform human experts at finding model vulnerabilities. They emphasize the urgent need to treat AI agents as inherently untrusted entities capable of correlated failures across the software ecosystem.
⚡️Every product of the future will be a living system — Ronak Malde, Trajectory.ai
Ronak Malde explains leaving DeepMind (and $2 billion in acquisition earnings) to found Trajectory.ai, arguing that AI products must evolve from static tools into "living systems" that continually learn from real-world user corrections across enterprise verticals like legal and finance.
The AI Frontier: from FLOPs to Megawatts — Anjney Midha, AMP
Anjney Midha argues that AI infrastructure is facing a crisis of inefficiency and cultural misalignment, proposing that compute be treated as a utility through an Independent System Operator model that pools multi-cloud resources while embedding community incentives directly into unit economics.