Perspectives on Peace — What Should Economists Teach?
TL;DR
Economist Amy Crockett analyzes how undergraduate economics textbooks largely fail to teach that markets inherently foster peace by providing non-violent mechanisms for resolving conflict, arguing that incorporating Kenneth Boulding's framework—focusing on social 'images,' accurate statistics, and cooperative policies—could empower students to see themselves as active participants in peace-building rather than passive recipients of government intervention.
🕊️ Markets as Peace-Building Institutions 2 insights
Competition Through Markets Replaces Violent Conflict
Economic rivals like Ford and General Motors or McDonald's and Burger King resolve competing interests through product differentiation, marketing campaigns, and innovation rather than property destruction or violence, demonstrating how markets provide structured alternatives to physical confrontation.
Legal Frameworks Enable Non-Violent Dispute Resolution
Commercial conflicts such as the intellectual property dispute between Cafe Rio and Costa Vida are resolved through lawsuits and private mediation rather than violent confrontation, illustrating how market economies embed peaceful mechanisms for addressing grievances and theft.
🧠 Boulding's Framework for Peace Education 3 insights
Education Shapes Social 'Images' of Appropriate Conduct
Boulding's concept of 'image' explains why certain violent actions become culturally unthinkable—such as a Ford CEO suggesting arson against GM—through education that defines acceptable economic behavior and international relations, like the unthinkability of war between the US and UK.
Economic Statistics Can Correct Pro-War Myths
Accurate economic education can dispel persistent myths—such as the belief that WWII ended the Great Depression—by revealing that wartime 'employment' often involves conscription and that military diversion of resources destroys rather than creates genuine prosperity.
Trade Policy Directly Impacts International Peace
Protectionist policies designed to 'export unemployment' through tariffs and import restrictions foster international conflict and deterioration of diplomatic relations, while cooperative specialization and trade create mutual dependence that promotes peaceful cross-border relations.
📚 Gaps in Current Textbooks and Pedagogical Opportunities 3 insights
Development Texts Analyze War's Costs but Omit Solutions
While 80% of development economics textbooks examined discuss how conflict destroys standard of living, reduces foreign investment, and damages infrastructure, only two texts explored actual peace-building solutions, leaving students without frameworks for addressing violence.
Overemphasis on Top-Down Government Solutions
Introductory micro and macro textbooks predominantly present collective action problems and externalities as requiring government intervention (such as Pigouvian taxes) while neglecting bottom-up community solutions and the capacity of individuals to negotiate peaceful resolutions without state involvement.
Students Must Be Taught They Are Peace Participants
Following Eleanor Ostrom's critique, economics education should empower students to recognize that ordinary citizens—not just national leaders or NGOs—play essential roles in sustaining peaceful institutions through daily market participation, cooperation, and community-based conflict resolution.
Bottom Line
Economics educators should explicitly teach that markets create cultures of peace by necessitating cooperation between parties and that students themselves are active agents in peace-building through their economic choices, not merely passive recipients of top-down government or NGO interventions.
More from Conversations with Tyler (Tyler Cowen)
View all
Sajjid Chinoy on Whether India Faces another 1991 Moment
Economist Sajjid Chinoy argues that while India has resolved supply-side constraints and cleaned up corporate balance sheets post-COVID, the economy now faces a binding demand-side crisis exacerbated by the largest energy shock in history, requiring a fundamental policy shift from macro stability toward structural employment generation to trigger private investment.
Sajjid Chinoy on Whether India Faces another 1991 Moment
While India is not facing a 1991-style balance of payments crisis, the economy is constrained by weak private investment due to insufficient demand, Chinese import competition, and fiscal pressures from welfare spending crowding out infrastructure investment, necessitating a policy pivot toward employment and exports.
Emily Chamlee-Wright — 2025 Markets and Society Conference Keynote
Liberal democracy faces collapse from both overt constitutional violations and the 'great forgetting' of its foundational principles. Chamlee-Wright argues that reversing this decay requires repairing liberalism's 'soft tissue'—the shared mental models, automatic norms, and cultural tools that make formal institutions function and scale.
Ritam Chaurey on Placing the Firm at the Center of India’s Structural Transformation
Development economist Ritam Chaurey explains how Indian firms navigate rigid labor regulations by substituting permanent workers with contract labor or exiting formality entirely, revealing that post-1991 liberalization exposed labor laws as the primary binding constraint on manufacturing growth while creating complex, often ambiguous effects on firm productivity and worker welfare.