Chandran Kukathas — 2023 Markets and Society Conference Keynote
TL;DR
Chandran Kukathas argues that an open society is fundamentally a regime of toleration that cannot be morally limited, as any attempt to restrict toleration by appealing to truth, justice, or reason begs the question; instead, departing from toleration is always an exercise of power, not moral justification.
🕊️ The Nature of Toleration 2 insights
Toleration as forbearance from power
True toleration means refraining from exercising power to compel others to conform to your views, applying only to behaviors you disapprove of and have the capacity to suppress.
Bayle's rejection of truth claims
Following Pierre Bayle, Kukathas asserts that claims to possess objective truth cannot justify compelling others, as dissenters claim truth with equal conviction, making such justification circular.
⚖️ The Limits of Toleration 3 insights
No moral limits possible
Attempts to limit toleration by appealing to justice fail because they presuppose the contested question of which conception of justice is correct, thus begging the question.
Critique of reasonable rejection
Kukathas challenges Rainer Forst's view that rules must be justifiable by reasons no one could reasonably reject, arguing this standard still begs the question against those who fundamentally reject such reasons.
The Spanish conquistador analogy
Just as Spanish conquistadors read justifications to trees because natives could not understand, offering supposedly unrejectable reasons to dissenters who reject them is futile and resolves nothing.
⚡ Power and the Open Society 2 insights
Power as the ultimate foundation
When regimes depart from toleration, they exercise power rather than enforce morality, acknowledging that power—not justice—is what ultimately establishes social order.
Open society as regime of regimes
An open society is an order of regimes that departs from pure toleration in the name of justice while remaining fundamentally grounded in power relationships both internally and externally.
Bottom Line
An open society must recognize that its boundaries are maintained through power rather than moral certainty, and true liberalism requires acknowledging that we cannot reasonably justify forcing conformity upon those who dissent.
More from Conversations with Tyler (Tyler Cowen)
View all
Paul Dragos Aligica — 2024 Markets and Society Conference Keynote
Paul Dragos Aligica argues that economics has historically neglected resilience despite its critical importance for institutional survival, proposing that synthesizing Austrian economics, public choice theory, and Ostrom's new institutionalism—what he terms 'mainline political economy'—provides the essential interdisciplinary framework for understanding how systems withstand shocks, recover, and potentially grow stronger.
Rahul Sagar on the Birth of Indian Nationalism
Political theorist Rahul Sagar uncovers the lost work of Narayan Mahadev Parmanand, a 19th-century intellectual whose anonymous writings constitute the first indigenous Indian political theory, revealing a distinctive liberal tradition focused on building capable states to combat social tyranny while binding monarchs' power through constitutional means.
Laura K. Field on the Making of the MAGA New Right
Laura K. Field analyzes the MAGA New Right as a deliberate intellectual movement (2016-2024) that rejects classical liberalism and Reagan-era fusionism in favor of nationalist economics, secure borders, and America First foreign policy, tracing its ideological radicalization through figures like Michael Anton and the Claremont Institute.
Sajjid Chinoy on Whether India Faces another 1991 Moment
Economist Sajjid Chinoy argues that while India has resolved supply-side constraints and cleaned up corporate balance sheets post-COVID, the economy now faces a binding demand-side crisis exacerbated by the largest energy shock in history, requiring a fundamental policy shift from macro stability toward structural employment generation to trigger private investment.