Nothing Is Priced In | Bob Elliott on Why Investors Are Misreading the Oil Shock
TL;DR
Bob Elliott argues the U.S. economy has shifted from income-driven growth to a fragile savings-dependent model just as a major oil shock hits, creating a dangerous combination where households may retrench rather than spend down savings, while markets have failed to price in any of these escalating risks.
🏦 The Savings-Driven Fragility 3 insights
Economy shifted from income to savings dependence
Households spent early 2025 drawing down savings to maintain 5.5% nominal spending growth despite weak 3.5% wage growth and zero employment growth over the prior nine months.
Asset prices now dictate spending behavior
Unlike previous years when rising stocks and housing supported confidence, flat asset prices over the last six months remove the psychological cushion for households to continue dissaving during shocks.
Corporate investment relies increasingly on debt
Companies have transitioned from financing capital expenditures through cash flows to borrowing, amplifying vulnerability to risk-off sentiment and credit tightening.
⛽ Oil Shock Transmission 3 insights
Gas prices jumped $1.00 in weeks with further upside
Retail gasoline rose from $2.99 to $3.99 per gallon since March 1st and could reach $4.50 if crude holds current levels, immediately reducing real household purchasing power.
Inflation impact estimated at 150-200 basis points
Every 10% rise in oil prices typically adds 20-30bps to headline inflation, implying the current 50-60% crude spike could push inflation up by 1.5-2 percentage points from the 2.5-3% baseline.
Parallels to 2008 rather than 2022
With soft labor markets, minimal government transfers, and weak asset prices, household behavior is likely to mirror the 2008 retrenchment rather than the 2022 savings drawdown response.
📉 Market Mispricing & Deleveraging 3 insights
Nothing is priced in to current asset values
Elliott emphasizes that equity markets have not discounted the magnitude of the oil shock or economic fragility, rendering pre-March economic data irrelevant for forward analysis.
Volatility spike forces systematic deleveraging
VIX jumped from 10-15 to 25-30, forcing macro investors to unwind winning positions in gold, international equities, and emerging markets regardless of fundamental outlook.
Gold liquidation represents final phase of selling
After holding as a risk hedge initially, gold saw massive ETF outflows last week as institutional investors booked 50% annual gains to meet volatility targets and reduce position sizes.
Bottom Line
Investors should treat recent economic data as meaningless, position for potential household retrenchment rather than 2022-style resilience, and expect continued volatility-driven selling until levered macro positions fully de-risk.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked GMO’s Head of Asset Allocation Why This Bubble is Easy — But Investors Will Get it Wrong
GMO's Ben Inker argues the current AI-driven US stock bubble is "easy" to navigate because investors can rotate to fairly priced international assets while maintaining normal risk levels, unlike the "hard" bubbles of 2007 and 2021 when all risk assets were simultaneously overvalued.
Expensive Market. Record Issuance. Can the Story Still Hold It Up? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, IPO strategist Andy Constan, and value investor Tobias Carlisle discuss how to value story-driven companies like SpaceX, why issuers intentionally underprice IPOs, and why investors should avoid market timing despite extreme overvaluation by targeting undervalued segments like small-cap value.
The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees
Tobias Carlisle warns that the market is at historic valuation extremes comparable to the dot-com bubble, but argues investors should rotate into deeply undervalued small and micro-cap value stocks rather than exit entirely, as early indicators suggest a potential decade-long rotation away from large-cap growth; meanwhile, he cautions that the massive AI infrastructure buildout risks following historical boom-bust patterns where value accrues to consumers, not creators.
The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth
Finance professor Aswath Damodaran analyzes SpaceX's $2.7 trillion valuation, finding that while the space launch and Starlink businesses hold real competitive advantages, the AI division's projected $26 trillion market relies on terrible unit economics and a contradictory strategy of renting data centers to direct competitors.