Invisible Rulers: Information Warfare and Public Trust
TL;DR
Renee DiResta traces her decade-long investigation into information warfare from early vaccine misinformation to Russian election interference, explaining how analysts now use the 'Actors, Behaviors, Content' framework to identify coordinated inauthentic networks rather than adjudicating specific speech, while detailing the shift from adversarial to collaborative relationships between researchers and tech platforms.
🔬 Origins of Information Warfare Research 2 insights
Accidental Entry via Public Health Data
Renee DiResta began investigating manipulation in 2013 after analyzing California kindergarten vaccination exemption data, which revealed how anti-vaccine movements exploited social media affordances to create false perceptions of majority opinion using transparent bots and amplification tactics.
State Department and Senate Investigations
Her analysis of ISIS social media success for the State Department led to leading a Senate Intelligence Committee investigation into Russian Internet Research Agency interference in the 2016 election, documenting the shift from activist bots to terrorist organizations to state-sponsored coordinated inauthentic behavior.
🎯 The ABC Analytical Framework 2 insights
Distinguishing Actors from Content
Developed by Camille Francois, the ABC framework prioritizes analyzing the entity behind speech (Actors) and their manipulation techniques (Behaviors) over the content itself, focusing on inauthenticity such as accounts pretending to be community members while operating from Pakistan or Nigeria.
Coordinated Behaviors vs. Speech
Effective detection targets manipulation of platform design—such as buying fake engagement, using bots to juice trending algorithms, or networks tweeting at the zero millisecond—rather than fact-checking specific claims, preserving focus on artificial amplification rather than suppressing authentic speech.
🤝 Platform Accountability Evolution 2 insights
From Adversarial to Collaborative
Following confrontational 2016 investigations where external researchers used CrowdTangle API to expose Russian operations that platforms downplayed, relationships evolved into formal partnerships where vetted researchers access internal data for joint investigations combining external cross-platform analysis with platform deep-dives.
Transparency vs. Unaccountable Power
Independent oversight prevents unaccountable private platforms from conducting opaque takedowns, as demonstrated when researchers successfully challenged Twitter to verify that suspected Latin American inauthentic accounts were actually authentic activists, ensuring accountability through evidence-based pushback.
Bottom Line
Combatting information warfare requires shifting from content moderation to detecting coordinated inauthentic behaviors and actor networks through transparent collaboration between independent researchers and platforms, ensuring manipulation is exposed without granting unaccountable private entities sole power to determine truth.
More from My First Million
View all
"On Making Organizational Culture Great," with Professor Glenn Carroll
Professor Glenn Carroll argues that effective organizational culture isn't measured by employee happiness but by strategic alignment, where a 'strong culture' acts as infrastructure that enables decentralized decision-making, reduces managerial overhead, and allows employees to execute strategy automatically without constant oversight.
Ep78 “What’s Wrong With Taxing Billionaires More?” with Joshua Rauh
Finance professors from Stanford and Wharton argue that California's proposed 5% billionaire wealth tax would likely lose money for the state due to taxpayer flight, violates the implicit contracts that drive innovation, and ignores that the wealthy already pay the vast majority of income taxes while generating massive economic value.
A Conversation with faculty about Stanford GSB's People, Culture, and Performance Program
Stanford GSB's People, Culture, and Performance program teaches executives to treat human capital as a competitive advantage through a 5.5-day immersive experience that blends social science research with real-world Silicon Valley practices.
Our AI Future: From Abundance to Apocalypse
Stanford economist Chad Jones explores AI's economic potential through two divergent scenarios: explosive growth driven by recursive self-improvement and full automation, versus continued 2% annual growth constrained by historical patterns and persistent human bottlenecks in production chains.