Inside the Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court
TL;DR
A New York Times investigation reveals that the Supreme Court's controversial 'shadow docket' originated in a pivotal five-day period in 2016, when Chief Justice Roberts successfully pushed to block Obama's Clean Power Plan through emergency orders, fundamentally altering how the court handles urgent cases with minimal deliberation.
⚖️ The Shadow Docket Phenomenon 2 insights
Bypassing centuries of procedure
The shadow docket allows justices to issue emergency rulings in days without full briefs, oral arguments, or the year-long deliberation typical of merits cases.
Exponential growth in emergency orders
While historically used for discrete issues like death penalty stays, the court has increasingly applied these orders to major national policies affecting immigration, presidential power, and climate regulation.
📜 The 2016 Clean Power Plan Crisis 3 insights
Chief Justice Roberts' unprecedented memo
Facing a request to freeze Obama's Clean Power Plan, Chief Justice Roberts circulated a 3-page memo arguing the EPA had 'tricked' the court in a prior case and the expensive regulation required immediate intervention.
The liberal justices' alarm
Justice Breyer countered that compliance wasn't required until 2030, while Justice Kagan warned the requested stay was 'unprecedented' and the complex case needed proper time for review.
Conservative pressure for action
Justice Alito argued that failing to block the rule would render the court's 'institutional legitimacy a nullity,' framing the emergency as existential to judicial authority.
🏛️ Lasting Institutional Impact 3 insights
Pre-judging the merits
Roberts revealed his conclusion that the rule was 'highly unlikely to survive' full review, treating the emergency application as a proxy for final judgment without standard procedural safeguards.
'Temporary' rulings with permanent consequences
Although framed as interim measures, these stays effectively decide cases because deportations, funding cuts, and regulatory freezes cannot be undone even if the court later rules differently.
A new era of judicial power
This 2016 episode established the procedural template for the modern shadow docket, which the court has since used over 20 times in recent years to decide major disputes with minimal public reasoning.
Bottom Line
The Supreme Court's modern practice of issuing rushed, consequential rulings on major policies through emergency orders traces back to 2016, when Chief Justice Roberts' frustration with the Obama administration drove the court to abandon deliberative norms for speed and ideological expediency.
More from New York Times Podcasts
View all
How Iranians See the War
Despite President Trump's calls for Iranians to overthrow their government during US-Israeli bombing campaigns, Iranians remained largely paralyzed by communication blackouts, regime oppression, and deep-seated trauma from decades of violent crackdowns on protesters.
The Time Loop Book Series You Should Be Reading
New York Times book critics discuss Danish author SV Bala's seven-volume novel 'On the Calculation of Volume,' which follows a woman trapped reliving November 18th, examining its hypnotic diary-style narrative, philosophical meditations on consumption, and deliberate rejection of time-loop genre conventions.
Trump vs. the Pope
Pope Leo XIV and President Trump are engaged in an unprecedented public feud over the morality of the war with Iran, with the traditionally mild-mannered Pope forcefully condemning Trump's threats to annihilate civilization while Trump has attacked the Pope as a 'tool of the radical left' and posted an AI image of himself as a Christ-like figure, forcing American Catholics including VP JD Vance to choose between religious authority and political loyalty.
The Only 3 Knives You Actually Need in Your Kitchen
Professional kitchen experts confirm you only need three specific knives to handle virtually any cooking task, and investing in individual high-quality blades tailored to your hand size beats buying expensive pre-made sets.