How Trump Was Persuaded to Regulate A.I.
TL;DR
President Trump signed a watered-down executive order requiring voluntary disclosure of AI models 30 days before release, marking a stark reversal from his administration's initial deregulatory stance after cybersecurity warnings from Anthropic, Microsoft, and JPMorgan triggered an internal White House battle between libertarian advisors and national security officials.
🏛️ The Regulatory Shift 2 insights
From 'beautiful baby' to acknowledged risk
The administration initially scrapped Biden-era AI safety rules in January, with Trump calling AI a 'beautiful baby' that shouldn't face 'foolish rules,' but reversed course after Anthropic's Mythos model demonstrated AI could autonomously identify software vulnerabilities for weaponized cyber attacks.
Corporate warnings drive policy change
Microsoft and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon directly warned the White House that advanced AI posed immediate threats to critical infrastructure and financial systems, creating political liability fears for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.
⚔️ Inside the White House Battle 2 insights
FDA-style proposal sparks industry revolt
The initial draft proposed a mandatory 90-day government review akin to FDA drug approvals, triggering intense lobbying from AI czar David Sacks and tech executives including Mark Zuckerberg who feared it would slam the brakes on innovation in the race against China.
Trump's last-minute reversal
Hours before a scheduled May 21st Oval Office signing ceremony, Trump canceled the order after calling tech executives including David Sacks, who told him directly 'don't sign this,' only to revive a compromise version weeks later after persistent pressure from Bessent and Wiles.
📜 The Compromise and Criticism 2 insights
Voluntary 30-day disclosure requirement
The final June 3rd executive order requires companies to voluntarily share AI models 30 days before public release—down from the proposed 90 days—and explicitly prohibits any mandatory licensing or pre-clearance process to appease industry concerns.
Populists demand stronger action
Populists like Steve Bannon and religious leaders criticize the measure as insufficient, arguing AI threatens working-class jobs and America's 'moral fabric,' and support bipartisan legislation by Senator Josh Hawley for more stringent federal oversight.
Bottom Line
The executive order represents a symbolic but largely toothless first step toward AI oversight, indicating that meaningful regulation will require Congressional legislation rather than voluntary industry cooperation or executive compromise.
More from New York Times Podcasts
View all
The Implosion of Graham Platner
Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner faces imminent campaign collapse following explosive sexual assault allegations, triggering a chaotic scramble to replace him on the Maine ballot by a July 13 deadline while exposing deep fissures between the party's progressive and establishment wings.
Ask Me About My Dead Son
Bereaved mother Susie Shaw shares a roadmap for supporting parents who have lost a child, explaining that asking specific, curious questions about the deceased—rather than offering generic condolences—provides the greatest comfort and keeps their memory present.
The Light Switches That Changed My Life
Wirecutter editors demonstrate how installing basic smart light switches transformed daily life for accessibility editor Claire Pearlman, who uses a wheelchair, eliminating her dependence on caregivers for lighting control and reducing mental load through voice-activated home automation.
Jill Lepore on What to Read This Fourth of July
Historian Jill Lepore examines America's upcoming 250th anniversary as a moment of profound political tension, comparing today's divisions to the cynical, protest-filled Bicentennial of 1976 while advocating for constitutional deliberation and collective reading as acts of civic participation.