Down 50%. Up 200% | Jared Dillian on the Regime Change Investors Aren't Ready For

| Stock Investing | March 19, 2026 | 8.74 Thousand views | 1:03:19

TL;DR

Jared Dillian argues markets structurally fail to price low-frequency, high-impact events due to 'willful ignorance,' while the post-2020 inflationary regime has broken the 60/40 portfolio by flipping stock-bond correlations positive, requiring investors to abandon outdated playbooks and embrace radical adaptability.

🌍 Market Blind Spots & Geopolitical Pricing 2 insights

Markets ignore obvious risks until they can't

Dillian observes that markets exhibit 'willful ignorance' toward geopolitical threats like the Ukraine war and Iran conflicts, failing to price them despite clear warnings until invasion or attack actually occurs.

Underreaction followed by overreaction

Investors typically underprice existential risks initially, then panic and overprice them after the fact, creating asymmetric bounce opportunities for traders positioned for volatility expansion.

🔄 The End of 60/40: Regime Change Mechanics 3 insights

The 1981-2020 playbook is permanently broken

The 60/40 portfolio worked for four decades because declining inflation created negative stock-bond correlation; post-2020 rising inflation flipped this to positive correlation, eliminating diversification benefits.

Investing is 'non-stationarity chess'

Dillian describes markets as games where rules change mid-play (like chess pieces suddenly moving differently), emphasizing that intellectual flexibility and rapid adaptation matter more than prediction.

Most investors fail by playing old rules

The danger of regime change isn't the shift itself, but that most market participants continue using obsolete strategies (like passive 60/40 allocations) long after correlations have fundamentally broken down.

⚖️ Volatility, Position Sizing, and Adaptability 2 insights

'Long gamma' as risk management philosophy

Influenced by Nassim Taleb, Dillian prefers buying options over selling them to avoid gap-risk tail events, though he notes current WTI oil options (150 implied vol, $20 monthly straddles) are unusually expensive and potentially attractive to sell.

Be a 'chicken' about position sizing

Even with high conviction, Dillian maintains modest position sizes to avoid being shaken out during drawdowns, noting that ETFs can be sized larger than individual stocks due to built-in diversification.

⛏️ Hard Assets & Commodity Bull Markets 2 insights

Commodities entered a stealth bull market

The commodity index bottomed in September 2024 and has rallied 30%, with leadership rotating from precious metals to energy and now agricultural commodities as Middle East conflicts threaten fertilizer and grain supplies through the Strait of Hormuz.

Extreme oil volatility signals regime uncertainty

With at-the-money WTI straddles pricing $20 monthly moves, options markets are pricing extreme uncertainty that reflects the difficulty of handicapping supply shocks in a geopolitically fractured environment.

Bottom Line

Abandon the 1981-2020 disinflationary playbook immediately, size positions conservatively enough to survive volatility spikes, and treat geopolitical risks as asymmetric opportunities rather than noise to be ignored until it's too late.

More from Excess Returns

View all
The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees
58:19
Excess Returns Excess Returns

The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees

Tobias Carlisle warns that the market is at historic valuation extremes comparable to the dot-com bubble, but argues investors should rotate into deeply undervalued small and micro-cap value stocks rather than exit entirely, as early indicators suggest a potential decade-long rotation away from large-cap growth; meanwhile, he cautions that the massive AI infrastructure buildout risks following historical boom-bust patterns where value accrues to consumers, not creators.

4 days ago · 10 points
The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth
1:08:27
Excess Returns Excess Returns

The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth

Finance professor Aswath Damodaran analyzes SpaceX's $2.7 trillion valuation, finding that while the space launch and Starlink businesses hold real competitive advantages, the AI division's projected $26 trillion market relies on terrible unit economics and a contradictory strategy of renting data centers to direct competitors.

6 days ago · 9 points