Dan Awrey on the Future of the U.S. Payments System in a Digital World
TL;DR
Dan Awrey argues that centuries of path dependency have bundled banking, money, and payments into a fragile system where technological innovation now outpaces legal frameworks, creating a 'shadow monetary system' of stablecoins and digital wallets that offer superior payment technology but lack the bankruptcy protections and central bank access needed for stable nominal value.
🏛️ The Unbundling Imperative 3 insights
Historical banking path dependency creates modern fragility
The current system resulted from centuries of experimentation that bundled money creation with banking, creating enormous path dependency that resists technological disruption despite changing consumer demands.
Money requires law while payments require technology
Good money depends on legal institutions and stable nominal value, whereas good payments depend on technology and governance, a distinction policymakers confuse when treating them as identical.
Central banks cannot plan away innovation
Awrey contends that central bankers acting as central planners cannot stop technological advancement, and delaying reform leaves them cleaning up messes rather than building better systems.
⚖️ Bankruptcy Risks in Shadow Money 3 insights
Bankruptcy is the Achilles heel of digital money
Unlike bank deposits, non-bank payment instruments like stablecoins are subject to bankruptcy freezes that prevent withdrawal and often leave users as unsecured creditors receiving less than par value.
USDC depegged to 84 cents during SVB collapse
When Silicon Valley Bank failed in March 2023, Circle's USDC stablecoin traded at 84 cents on the dollar because it held $3 billion in uninsured deposits at the bank, exposing the fragility of indirect Fed access.
State laws permit risky asset backing
Heterogeneous state money transmitter laws allow firms like PayPal and MoneyGram to invest customer funds in risky assets including mortgage-backed securities and equities, creating potential for nominal value loss.
🏦 Policy Shortcomings and Solutions 3 insights
Genius Act fails to ensure monetary stability
Recent legislation like the Genius Act regulates stablecoins but fails to provide non-bank issuers explicit pathways to Federal Reserve master accounts, perpetuating reliance on fragile bank intermediaries.
Skinny master accounts are insufficient branding
Proposals for 'skinny' Fed master accounts are superficial distinctions that don't change Section 131 of the Federal Reserve Act, which limits direct central bank access to traditional depository institutions.
Congress must amend Section 131
True reform requires congressional action to expand Federal Reserve Act eligibility beyond banks, allowing payment innovators direct access to central bank infrastructure and lender-of-last-resort protections.
👥 Designing Money for the Future 2 insights
Generational divide in payment preferences
Younger users prioritize instant payment technology and convenience, while older generations and regulators focus on long-term nominal stability, creating tension between today's payment experience and tomorrow's value preservation.
Equity-based money excludes the vulnerable
Proposals for equity-linked money like John Cochrane's ETF-backed payments fail for paycheck-to-paycheck households who cannot tolerate 10% capital losses when budgeting for rent and groceries.
Bottom Line
Policymakers must unbundle money from banking by amending the Federal Reserve Act to give non-bank payment issuers direct central bank access and bankruptcy protections, ensuring technological innovation in payments doesn't sacrifice the stable nominal value required for sound money.
More from Conversations with Tyler (Tyler Cowen)
View all
Sajjid Chinoy on Whether India Faces another 1991 Moment
Economist Sajjid Chinoy argues that while India has resolved supply-side constraints and cleaned up corporate balance sheets post-COVID, the economy now faces a binding demand-side crisis exacerbated by the largest energy shock in history, requiring a fundamental policy shift from macro stability toward structural employment generation to trigger private investment.
Sajjid Chinoy on Whether India Faces another 1991 Moment
While India is not facing a 1991-style balance of payments crisis, the economy is constrained by weak private investment due to insufficient demand, Chinese import competition, and fiscal pressures from welfare spending crowding out infrastructure investment, necessitating a policy pivot toward employment and exports.
Emily Chamlee-Wright — 2025 Markets and Society Conference Keynote
Liberal democracy faces collapse from both overt constitutional violations and the 'great forgetting' of its foundational principles. Chamlee-Wright argues that reversing this decay requires repairing liberalism's 'soft tissue'—the shared mental models, automatic norms, and cultural tools that make formal institutions function and scale.
Ritam Chaurey on Placing the Firm at the Center of India’s Structural Transformation
Development economist Ritam Chaurey explains how Indian firms navigate rigid labor regulations by substituting permanent workers with contract labor or exiting formality entirely, revealing that post-1991 liberalization exposed labor laws as the primary binding constraint on manufacturing growth while creating complex, often ambiguous effects on firm productivity and worker welfare.