Chris Coyne — 2023 Markets and Society Conference Keynote
TL;DR
Economist Chris Coyne contrasts state-imposed 'Pax Imperii' with emergent 'Pax Hominum,' arguing that top-down peacemaking relies on four flawed assumptions about elite capabilities while generating illiberal violence abroad and eroding domestic liberty through expanded state power.
⚖️ Two Models of Peace 3 insights
Pax Imperii: The State-Centric View
This dominant perspective treats peace as a government-provided public good requiring vertical, coercive power (Leviathan) to impose order, exemplified by historical hegemonies like Pax Romana and Pax Americana.
Pax Hominum: The Emergent Alternative
Bottom-up peace arises from horizontal, voluntary cooperation among ordinary people exercising diverse, context-specific skills within heterogeneous cultures rather than through centralized design.
Mainline Political Economy Framework
Drawing on Boettke, Haeffele, and Storr, this tradition emphasizes that social cooperation is possible without central direction despite human cognitive limits, highlighting spontaneous order over expert control.
🎯 Four Fallacies of Top-Down Peacemaking 4 insights
The Design Delusion
Proponents assume a 'peacemaking power elite' can deliberately engineer complex peace institutions, ignoring Hayekian insights and James Scott's critique in 'Seeing Like a State' that order emerges from human action but not human design.
The Knowledge Problem
Elites lack access to tacit, context-specific local knowledge necessary for functional institutions, causing imposed systems to fail against the friction of 'institutional stickiness' with underlying cultural practices.
Incentive Misalignment
Public choice theory reveals that democratic frictions and bureaucratic pathologies lead elites to pursue narrow opportunism rather than the public interest, particularly when intervening in foreign polities where accountability is absent.
The Imperial Myth
The assumption that imperialism promotes liberal values contradicts Caroline Elkins' documentation in 'Legacy of Violence' that violence was endemic to the British Empire, serving as both means and end of colonial rule.
⚠️ The Illiberal Consequences 3 insights
Crypto-Imperialism Crowds Out Self-Governance
Interventions marketed as fostering freedom often impose arrangements that prevent the development of genuine liberal skills, creating what Vincent Ostrom calls 'crypto imperialism' or 'jack boot peace' through militarized authoritarianism.
Domestic Liberty Erosion
Preparing for global interventions requires expansive discretionary state power that destroys constitutional constraints and informal norms, permanently expanding government scale and scope while reducing freedoms at home (Higgs, Hall).
Violence as Means and End
Rather than exporting liberty, top-down peacemaking generates violence and dependency that undermine liberal values abroad while corrupting institutional integrity within the intervening nation.
Bottom Line
Genuine liberal peace requires abandoning imperial interventions in favor of bottom-up processes that respect local knowledge, emergent voluntary cooperation, and the severe limits of centralized social engineering.
More from Conversations with Tyler (Tyler Cowen)
View all
Sajjid Chinoy on Whether India Faces another 1991 Moment
Economist Sajjid Chinoy argues that while India has resolved supply-side constraints and cleaned up corporate balance sheets post-COVID, the economy now faces a binding demand-side crisis exacerbated by the largest energy shock in history, requiring a fundamental policy shift from macro stability toward structural employment generation to trigger private investment.
Sajjid Chinoy on Whether India Faces another 1991 Moment
While India is not facing a 1991-style balance of payments crisis, the economy is constrained by weak private investment due to insufficient demand, Chinese import competition, and fiscal pressures from welfare spending crowding out infrastructure investment, necessitating a policy pivot toward employment and exports.
Emily Chamlee-Wright — 2025 Markets and Society Conference Keynote
Liberal democracy faces collapse from both overt constitutional violations and the 'great forgetting' of its foundational principles. Chamlee-Wright argues that reversing this decay requires repairing liberalism's 'soft tissue'—the shared mental models, automatic norms, and cultural tools that make formal institutions function and scale.
Ritam Chaurey on Placing the Firm at the Center of India’s Structural Transformation
Development economist Ritam Chaurey explains how Indian firms navigate rigid labor regulations by substituting permanent workers with contract labor or exiting formality entirely, revealing that post-1991 liberalization exposed labor laws as the primary binding constraint on manufacturing growth while creating complex, often ambiguous effects on firm productivity and worker welfare.