14% for Tech. 1% for Everyone Else | The Weekly Wrap – 3/14/2026
TL;DR
As AI and geopolitical volatility widen the range of possible economic outcomes, investors face a bifurcated landscape where 'new era' tech spending grows at 14% while the remaining 89% of the economy stagnates at 1%. The hosts distill insights from three experts emphasizing that humility, diversification, and backing adaptive 'learning organizations' are essential to navigating a market where traditional software moats are eroding and macro uncertainty is extreme.
📊 The Great Economic Bifurcation 3 insights
New era spending dominates stagnant economy
Real spending on 'new era' sectors is growing at 14% annually, while the remaining 89% of the economy posts only 1% growth, creating a deeply bifurcated economic environment.
Defense spending supercycle emerging
NATO countries are projected to increase defense spending by $1 trillion over the next decade, representing a significant structural growth opportunity amid geopolitical realignment.
Recessionary setup masking bull potential
With approximately 90% of the economy potentially already in recession, the introduction of policy stimulus at this stage historically characterizes the beginning of a new bull market.
🧠 Navigating Uncertainty with Humility 3 insights
Diversification as humility in practice
Vitaliy Katsenelson expanded his portfolio from 20 to 30 positions to reflect wider uncertainty about AI and geopolitical outcomes, using diversification to hedge against unknown unknowns.
Focus on constants amid rapid change
Rather than predicting specific disruptions, investors should identify what remains unchanged—such as the need for commodities and defense capabilities—and anchor portfolios to these enduring realities.
Earned skepticism required
In an environment where outcome ranges have widened dramatically, investors must practice humility regarding their own knowledge while maintaining skepticism toward overconfident external forecasts.
🤖 AI's Existential Threat to Software 3 insights
Software moats eroding rapidly
Joseph Shapnik sold software positions mid-2024, recognizing early that AI disruption threatens the asset-light, recurring-revenue model that previously made software the 'highest quality' sector.
Learning cultures versus static management
Successful companies will be 'learning organizations' with decentralized decision-making and flexible capital allocation, unlike rigid management teams wedded to legacy strategies that AI may render obsolete.
Valuation disconnect between markets
While public software valuations have collapsed significantly, private market valuations have remained surprisingly sticky, creating opportunities for adaptive allocators like Constellation Software to invest in public targets.
Bottom Line
In an era of radical uncertainty and AI disruption, prioritize portfolio diversification and invest only in management teams that demonstrate adaptive 'learning cultures' capable of evolving faster than their business models are being disrupted.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked GMO’s Head of Asset Allocation Why This Bubble is Easy — But Investors Will Get it Wrong
GMO's Ben Inker argues the current AI-driven US stock bubble is "easy" to navigate because investors can rotate to fairly priced international assets while maintaining normal risk levels, unlike the "hard" bubbles of 2007 and 2021 when all risk assets were simultaneously overvalued.
Expensive Market. Record Issuance. Can the Story Still Hold It Up? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, IPO strategist Andy Constan, and value investor Tobias Carlisle discuss how to value story-driven companies like SpaceX, why issuers intentionally underprice IPOs, and why investors should avoid market timing despite extreme overvaluation by targeting undervalued segments like small-cap value.
The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees
Tobias Carlisle warns that the market is at historic valuation extremes comparable to the dot-com bubble, but argues investors should rotate into deeply undervalued small and micro-cap value stocks rather than exit entirely, as early indicators suggest a potential decade-long rotation away from large-cap growth; meanwhile, he cautions that the massive AI infrastructure buildout risks following historical boom-bust patterns where value accrues to consumers, not creators.
The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth
Finance professor Aswath Damodaran analyzes SpaceX's $2.7 trillion valuation, finding that while the space launch and Starlink businesses hold real competitive advantages, the AI division's projected $26 trillion market relies on terrible unit economics and a contradictory strategy of renting data centers to direct competitors.