1% Growth. Zero Jobs | Jim Paulsen on the Recession Investors Are Missing
TL;DR
Jim Paulsen argues that 89% of the economy is already in a 'growth recession' (1% growth, zero jobs) while a small 11% 'new era' tech sector masks the weakness, suggesting investors should look through geopolitical 'Trumpetility' to buy beaten-down international equities as Fed easing becomes more likely than sustained inflation.
⚡ The Two-Speed Economy 2 insights
89% of economy flatlined while 11% drives all growth
Real spending in the 'new era' tech sector grew 14% year-over-year while the remaining 89% of the economy expanded just 1%, creating a historic divergence where a tiny deflationary segment masks severe weakness in the broader economy.
Zero job creation signals hidden recession
Current data shows 1% GDP growth paired with zero job creation, a combination that historically coincided with deep recessions, suggesting the 'old economy' is already contracting despite resilient headline figures.
🛡️ Geopolitical Risk & Market Positioning 3 insights
'Trumpetility' risks already vetted by markets
Paulsen views the Iran conflict as part of ongoing policy volatility that markets have adapted to, citing the VIX spiking to 26 and sentiment hitting April 2025 fear lows as evidence significant de-risking has already occurred.
Oil shock contained by historical context
While Brent crude breached $90, this remains within the $70-95 range observed throughout 2023-2024, and energy now comprises just 10% of consumer budgets versus 20-25% decades ago, limiting sustained inflationary impact.
Dollar strength reflects safe-haven flows
The dollar's recent bid primarily represents flight-to-safety dynamics rather than structural strength, as it remains well below January 2025 highs and has traded largely flat over the past 12 months.
📈 Investment Strategy 2 insights
Weak payrolls support Fed easing trajectory
Despite oil volatility, persistently weak job reports increase the probability of Federal Reserve rate cuts later this year, as higher energy costs act as a contractionary tax on an already fragile underlying economy.
Systematic buying of international weakness
Paulsen recommends dollar-cost averaging into battered international and emerging market equities over 30-60 days, arguing the fundamental case for non-US exposure remains intact and current fear levels are overdone.
Bottom Line
With 90% of the economy already experiencing a growth recession and markets having over-vetted geopolitical risks, investors should systematically accumulate international equities and prepare for potential Fed easing rather than sustained inflation.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked GMO’s Head of Asset Allocation Why This Bubble is Easy — But Investors Will Get it Wrong
GMO's Ben Inker argues the current AI-driven US stock bubble is "easy" to navigate because investors can rotate to fairly priced international assets while maintaining normal risk levels, unlike the "hard" bubbles of 2007 and 2021 when all risk assets were simultaneously overvalued.
Expensive Market. Record Issuance. Can the Story Still Hold It Up? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Valuation expert Aswath Damodaran, IPO strategist Andy Constan, and value investor Tobias Carlisle discuss how to value story-driven companies like SpaceX, why issuers intentionally underprice IPOs, and why investors should avoid market timing despite extreme overvaluation by targeting undervalued segments like small-cap value.
The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees
Tobias Carlisle warns that the market is at historic valuation extremes comparable to the dot-com bubble, but argues investors should rotate into deeply undervalued small and micro-cap value stocks rather than exit entirely, as early indicators suggest a potential decade-long rotation away from large-cap growth; meanwhile, he cautions that the massive AI infrastructure buildout risks following historical boom-bust patterns where value accrues to consumers, not creators.
The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth
Finance professor Aswath Damodaran analyzes SpaceX's $2.7 trillion valuation, finding that while the space launch and Starlink businesses hold real competitive advantages, the AI division's projected $26 trillion market relies on terrible unit economics and a contradictory strategy of renting data centers to direct competitors.