Will the Iran War Break MAGA? | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
TL;DR
Despite Trump campaigning on ending endless wars, his second administration has become hawkish, launching wars with Iran and interventions in multiple countries, betraying the America First movement that helped elect him.
⚔️ Trump's Hawkish Turn 3 insights
Major policy reversal from campaign promises
Trump is now at war with Iran, backing Ukraine against Russia, and intervening in Venezuela and Nigeria despite promising to end endless wars.
Early restraint efforts were abandoned
The administration initially pursued diplomacy with Iran negotiations in April 2025 and Vance's confrontation with Zelensky, but quickly shifted to military action.
Presidential personality drives war decisions
Trump's impatience with diplomacy, agreeableness to hawks in his administration, and attraction to military strikes override restraint-oriented advisors.
🇺🇸 The America First Ideology 3 insights
Conservative anti-globalism defines the movement
The ideology combines skepticism of overseas empire, opposition to mass immigration, and rejection of free trade policies that don't serve national interests.
Historical precedent exists for restraint
Mills traces a Republican tradition from Eisenhower through Nixon that was internationalist but skeptical of military intervention, preferring diplomacy to warfare.
Public support exists but needs leadership
Opposition to interventions comes primarily from DC and New York elites, not grassroots protests, suggesting Americans would support restraint if explained properly.
📊 Political Dynamics and Support 3 insights
Republican voters follow Trump's lead
Overwhelming Republican support for the Iran war reflects partisan deference rather than genuine hawkish philosophy - they would likely support peace deals if Trump negotiated them.
European allies exploit Trump's hawkishness
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz immediately flew to DC when the Iran war started, supporting Trump on Iran to get him back on board with NATO and Ukraine.
Generational divide shapes foreign policy views
Older conservatives maintain stronger hawkish defaults from previous eras, while younger appointees were more aligned with restraint principles before being overruled.
Bottom Line
Trump's return to interventionist foreign policy represents a fundamental betrayal of the America First movement, driven more by his personality traits and elite pressure than genuine strategic thinking or voter demands.
More from Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
View all
Will the Iran Deal Last? JD Vance Is Betting His Future on It. | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Vice President JD Vance outlines the Trump administration's Iran peace deal, emphasizing the destruction of enriched uranium stockpiles, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and strict conditions tying any economic benefits to verified behavioral transformation, negotiated from a position of Iranian military weakness rather than the strength they held during the Obama-era JCPOA.
Better Sex, Better Hair, Better Sleep: ‘Human-Maxxing’ is Here | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Christian Angermayer advocates for "human-maxxing"—using FDA-approved drugs and technology to maximize human potential without becoming post-human. Through initiatives like the Enhanced Games, he promotes medically supervised performance enhancement, fair athlete pay, and the normalization of hormone optimization for everyday improvements from sleep to sex.
Epstein, J.F.K. and U.F.Os: Anna Paulina Luna Wants Disclosure | Interesting Times With Ross Douthat
Representative Anna Paulina Luna discusses her populist-conservative approach to reforming Congress, emphasizing anti-corruption measures like banning insider trading while pursuing transparency on government secrets including UFOs and the JFK assassination.
Our Military Is Built for the Wrong Century | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Chris Brose argues that the US military remains trapped in outdated assumptions of short, decisive wars with technological superiority, leaving it unprepared for the attritional, drone-dominated reality of modern combat against peer adversaries like Russia and Iran.