Will the Iran War Break MAGA? | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
TL;DR
Despite Trump campaigning on ending endless wars, his second administration has become hawkish, launching wars with Iran and interventions in multiple countries, betraying the America First movement that helped elect him.
⚔️ Trump's Hawkish Turn 3 insights
Major policy reversal from campaign promises
Trump is now at war with Iran, backing Ukraine against Russia, and intervening in Venezuela and Nigeria despite promising to end endless wars.
Early restraint efforts were abandoned
The administration initially pursued diplomacy with Iran negotiations in April 2025 and Vance's confrontation with Zelensky, but quickly shifted to military action.
Presidential personality drives war decisions
Trump's impatience with diplomacy, agreeableness to hawks in his administration, and attraction to military strikes override restraint-oriented advisors.
🇺🇸 The America First Ideology 3 insights
Conservative anti-globalism defines the movement
The ideology combines skepticism of overseas empire, opposition to mass immigration, and rejection of free trade policies that don't serve national interests.
Historical precedent exists for restraint
Mills traces a Republican tradition from Eisenhower through Nixon that was internationalist but skeptical of military intervention, preferring diplomacy to warfare.
Public support exists but needs leadership
Opposition to interventions comes primarily from DC and New York elites, not grassroots protests, suggesting Americans would support restraint if explained properly.
📊 Political Dynamics and Support 3 insights
Republican voters follow Trump's lead
Overwhelming Republican support for the Iran war reflects partisan deference rather than genuine hawkish philosophy - they would likely support peace deals if Trump negotiated them.
European allies exploit Trump's hawkishness
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz immediately flew to DC when the Iran war started, supporting Trump on Iran to get him back on board with NATO and Ukraine.
Generational divide shapes foreign policy views
Older conservatives maintain stronger hawkish defaults from previous eras, while younger appointees were more aligned with restraint principles before being overruled.
Bottom Line
Trump's return to interventionist foreign policy represents a fundamental betrayal of the America First movement, driven more by his personality traits and elite pressure than genuine strategic thinking or voter demands.
More from Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
View all
Ray Dalio’s Theory of American Decline | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Ray Dalio argues that the United States is exhibiting classic symptoms of imperial decline through three converging cycles: unsustainable debt monetization, irreconcilable domestic political conflicts, and the collapse of the post-war international order. Drawing from 500 years of historical patterns, he warns that current geopolitical failures—particularly regarding Iran—could trigger a 'Suez moment' that accelerates the dollar's loss of reserve status, making diversification into alternative stores of wealth essential.
Confronting the Weirdness of a Waymo Future | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Transportation expert Andrew Miller predicts self-driving taxis will become as common as Uber in North American cities by 2035, potentially eliminating most of the 40,000 annual road deaths and reclaiming millions of hours of human attention, but success depends on resolving manufacturer liability and reconciling urban planning efficiency goals with American preferences for private transportation.
Why We All Need a Little Bitcoin | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Anthony Pompliano argues Bitcoin serves as essential protection against inevitable government currency debasement, functioning as scarce "digital gold" that is superior to physical gold in portability and security while offering a neutral, non-sovereign asset for both Wall Street institutions and geopolitical adversaries.
How the Supreme Court Defeated Trump | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Constitutional lawyer Sarah Isgur argues that despite aggressive attempts to expand executive authority, Donald Trump has failed to implement his major policy initiatives because the Supreme Court has systematically blocked unilateral power grabs, attempting to force Congress to reclaim its constitutional role after a century of executive power creep.