`What the Best Agents Share` — Mardu Swanepoel, Flinn AI
TL;DR
Mardu Swanepoel from Flinn AI analyzes four design patterns shared by top AI agents—focus modes, transparent execution, personalization, and reversibility—to demonstrate how constraining scope, building trust, and reducing downside risk creates more effective human-agent collaboration.
🎯 Focus Modes 3 insights
Constrain action spaces to improve quality
Limiting agents to specific modes allows engineers to optimize prompts and tools for narrower domains, resulting in higher output quality.
Align user expectations with specific contexts
Modes like Cursor's dropdown selections signal exactly what the agent will do, preventing unrealistic expectations while tailoring inputs for specific tasks.
Enable specialized behaviors per mode
Cursor's planning mode asks questions without writing code, while debug mode uses hypothesis-driven approaches with dedicated servers.
🔍 Transparent Execution 3 insights
Shift from delegation to collaboration
Making the agent's thought process, tool calls, and assumptions visible transforms the user from a passive recipient into an active participant.
Build trust through process visibility
Claude co-work displays progress lists and input/output logs, helping users understand how conclusions are reached rather than just viewing end results.
Enable early intervention to reduce waste
When users can see intermediate steps like which documents were read, they can course-correct before the agent wastes time on wrong approaches.
👤 Personalization 3 insights
Optimize for speed to understanding
Agents must grasp user-specific nuances before generating outputs, as speed is useless if results don't match user intent.
Encode institutional knowledge via playbooks
Harvey allows legal firms to encode review methods into 'playbooks,' ensuring the agent follows firm-specific methodologies.
Leverage memory for contextual continuity
Harvey and Claude use persistent memory and skills to accumulate user preferences across sessions.
↩️ Reversibility 4 insights
Bind the cost of mistakes to encourage boldness
When users can undo actions, they delegate higher-value, riskier tasks because the ROI calculation favors experimentation.
Implement multi-granularity rollback
Cursor offers line-level accept/reject, file-level reverts, and conversation state rollback without losing entire workflows.
Support parallel experimentation
Cursor enables generating multiple outputs from different models, letting users compare results and discard unsuccessful attempts.
Integrate with native versioning systems
Harvey's Word add-in uses native track changes API, presenting agent edits as standard legal document revisions.
Bottom Line
Design agents that constrain their scope to specific modes, make their reasoning transparent, embed user-specific context, and provide robust undo capabilities to transform AI from a black-box tool into a trustworthy collaborative partner.
More from AI Engineer
View all
Think You Can Build a Game with AI? Think Again! - Danielle An & David Hoe, Meta
Meta engineers Danielle An and David Hoe argue that while AI has democratized basic game creation, true differentiation requires human taste, cohesive aesthetics powered by key art anchoring, and innovative runtime LLMs that enable unscripted, dynamically personalized gameplay experiences previously impossible in traditional development.
Beyond the Harness: A Journey Towards Adaptative Engineering - Rajiv Chandegra, Annicha Labs
Rajiv Chandegra introduces 'adaptive engineering,' a paradigm shift from fixed AI harnesses (like Cursor or Claude Code) to dynamic, self-organizing systems that emerge during runtime, enabling AI to handle complex, real-world messes beyond deterministic software environments.
What if the harness mattered more than the model? - Aditya Bhargava, Etsy
Aditya Bhargava argues that sophisticated agent harnesses can compensate for weaker open-source models, enabling local AI to match proprietary performance while reducing vendor dependency.
Frontier results, on device - RL Nabors, Arize
Rachel Lee Neighbors introduces a framework for replacing expensive cloud-based frontier models with Small Language Models (SLMs) running on-device, demonstrating how a systematic 'prototype big, deploy small' approach using evaluation tools like Phoenix can cut inference costs to zero while maintaining 90% accuracy and enabling offline functionality.