What Drives Political Violence in America
TL;DR
University of Chicago Professor Robert Pape warns that America has entered an era of 'violent populism' where 14-21% of Americans—tens of millions on both the left and right—now view political violence as acceptable, creating unprecedented democratic risks as the country undergoes major demographic and economic power shifts.
📊 The Scale of Violent Populism 3 insights
Mainstream acceptance of violence has doubled
Support for political violence to achieve political goals has risen from roughly 10% during the Biden administration to between 14-21% today, with roughly half of those supporters believing assassinations are justified.
Millions find assassinations acceptable
Approximately 20 million American adults on each side found the assassinations of figures like Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassination of Nancy Pelosi acceptable according to surveys conducted in January 2025.
Threats to officials up fivefold
Prosecuted threats against members of Congress increased fivefold starting in 2017 and remained elevated through both the Trump and Biden presidencies, affecting Democratic and Republican targets equally.
🔄 Root Causes: Social and Economic Shifts 3 insights
Historic demographic transition
For the first time in 250 years, America is shifting from a white majority to a white minority democracy, with non-Hispanic whites dropping from 88% in 1960 to 57% today and projected to reach 49% within 20 years.
Concentration of wealth
Since the mid-1980s, wealth has systematically shifted from the bottom 90% to the top 1% regardless of which party held power, fueling bipartisan economic anxiety among Americans who feel their prospects are declining.
Fear of political lockout
Both sides fear permanent political exclusion during this 20-year 'tipping point' generation, treating politics as existential rather than policy disputes and believing violence may be their last chance to reverse irreversible change.
👥 The Profile of Violence Supporters 3 insights
Middle-class radicals, not just marginalized
Contrary to historical patterns, large numbers of educated, middle-class and upper-middle-class Americans support violence because they fear losing status and political power, not because they have nothing to lose.
Social approval enables violent acts
When tens of millions view violence as acceptable, it provides social legitimacy that pushes psychologically volatile individuals over the edge while making tips to the FBI less likely as people look the other way.
Leadership rhetoric escalates tensions
Violent metaphors and punching rhetoric from leaders across the political spectrum—including Donald Trump, AOC, and Gavin Newsom—contribute to normalizing aggression and signaling that physical fighting is necessary.
⚠️ Historical Context and Future Risks 2 insights
Bilateral violence is unprecedented
While the 1920s saw right-wing violent populism and the 1960s saw left-wing versions, the current era is distinct because both sides simultaneously support violence in large numbers for the first time in American history.
Upcoming elections are high-risk
The November midterm elections may be the most dangerous in modern American history due to the convergence of violent populist attitudes, existential fears, and the transitional political moment.
Bottom Line
American leaders must immediately de-escalate violent rhetoric and address the underlying demographic and economic anxieties driving mainstream support for political violence before the upcoming elections trigger further bloodshed.
More from New York Times Podcasts
View all
‘The Book Review’ Podcast Turns 20
New York Times book critics Gilbert Cruz, Tina Jordan, and Dwight Garner reflect on two decades of literary evolution, tracing how memoir scandals, dystopian YA blockbusters, Scandinavian crime waves, and the autofiction revolution reshaped reading habits and publishing trends.
The Best Mother’s Day Gifts for Every Type of Mom
Wirecutter gift expert Samantha Shea joins hosts Kyra Blackwell and Rosie Garen to share curated Mother's Day gift ideas organized by life stage, emphasizing that the best presents acknowledge maternal labor, provide genuine breaks, and avoid adding to a mother's mental load.
Who’s Really Running Iran?
Iran's power structure has fundamentally shifted from clerical rule to military control, with Revolutionary Guards generals now making key decisions while the injured Supreme Leader remains sidelined, potentially making pragmatic deals with the US more likely.
Inside Kash Patel’s F.B.I.
Under Kash Patel's leadership, the FBI has transformed from an independent law enforcement agency into a politically driven organization focused on immigration enforcement and media optics, with 45 current and former employees describing operational chaos, abrupt reassignments, and a crisis of mission that they fear compromises national security.