What Do You Do When a Family Member Commits a Terrible Crime? | 'The Opinions' Podcast
TL;DR
Author Harriet Clark, whose mother served 37 years in prison for a deadly robbery, joins New York Times columnist M. Gesson—whose cousin is serving a 10-year sentence for plotting to kill his ex-wife—to discuss how families navigate relationships with incarcerated relatives who have committed serious crimes, arguing that maintaining parent-child connections serves children's wellbeing better than permanent removal.
👨👩👧 Children of Incarcerated Parents 3 insights
Children need connection to avoid black hole abandonment
Clark explains that when parents disappear into prison without maintained contact, children inherit the painful knowledge that they are 'leavable' and are left with mythic, unprocessable absences rather than real relationships.
Facilitated visits can preserve family bonds
During Clark's 37 years of visiting her mother, a children's center with crafts and games demonstrated that prison environments can be adapted to support child development rather than sever ties.
Collective reality normalizes the experience
Visiting rooms filled with other children facing similar circumstances help kids understand they are not alone, countering the isolation of having an incarcerated parent.
🚫 Flaws in Carceral Logic 3 insights
Absence often damages more than managed presence
Clark's limited contact with her father—due to family anger and harsh visiting conditions—left her feeling more abandoned and confused than her maintained relationship with her mother did.
Disconnection replicates prison's punitive architecture
When families cut ties completely, they replicate the carceral system's logic of removal rather than creating the 'companioned' support children need to process difficult realities.
Five million children face this reality
With five million American children experiencing parental incarceration, the choice between abandonment and maintained connection affects a significant demographic.
⚖️ Vengeance, Justice, and Moving Forward 3 insights
The legal system channels rather than contains vengeance
Gesson observed that prosecutors amplify vengeful impulses rather than mediating them, while Clark notes that survivor communities often pressure parole boards to deny release regardless of rehabilitation.
Safety and connection must coexist
Healing requires collectively figuring out how incarcerated parents can support their children while ensuring victims remain safe and feel secure after release.
Post-crime relationships require dignity and effort
Rather than 'letting sleeping dogs lie,' families must engage in the difficult, ongoing work of helping incarcerated relatives become the best parents possible while acknowledging the harm caused.
Bottom Line
Families should actively facilitate relationships between children and incarcerated parents through regular contact and emotional support, recognizing that maintained connection—not permanent removal—serves both child wellbeing and community healing while still requiring accountability for harm caused.
More from New York Times Podcasts
View all
MAHA Is No Longer Useful to Trump | 'The Opinions' Podcast
The MAHA movement is fragmenting as its contradictory coalition proves politically unsustainable, revealing itself to be more of an opportunistic brand than a governing force, even as it taps into legitimate grievances about healthcare affordability and environmental health that neither party adequately addresses.
I Tried Everything to Escape My Heartbreak. Only This Worked.
TV writer Lauren Bans discovered escape rooms as an unlikely remedy for heartbreak after her husband's infidelity ended their marriage while she was seven months pregnant, finding that the intense cognitive focus required by immersive puzzles succeeded where therapy, Reiki, and traditional distractions failed.
A Trump Dissenter Fights for His Political Life
Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky conservative who has defied Trump on key votes including Epstein file transparency, faces his toughest primary challenge ever from Trump-endorsed Ed Galrine in what's become the most expensive House primary in American history.
The Courtroom Showdown Between Elon Musk and Sam Altman
Elon Musk is suing OpenAI for $150 billion, claiming Sam Altman betrayed the company's original nonprofit mission by converting it into a for-profit entity, in a trial that hinges on which billionaire the jury finds more credible.