We Asked an $850M Trend Manager Why Only 6 Funds Out of 10,000 Deliver What Investors Actually Want
TL;DR
Trend manager Eric Kittinden explains how his $850M fund navigated a severe drawdown during abrupt market reversals by maintaining systematic discipline across multiple timeframes, emphasizing that the best opportunities emerge during periods of maximum psychological and social pressure when most investors abandon the strategy.
🔁 Regime Shifts and Drawdown Psychology 3 insights
Best opportunities emerge under psychological pressure
Eric notes that the most fertile soil for new trends appears during drawdowns when strategies are unloved and allocators are fleeing, stating this is a recurring theme throughout his 30-year career.
Whipsaws strike when positioned for 'happy days'
The fund entered the turmoil with full risk-on positioning (long global equities, short bonds, long dollar) and suffered significant but survivable drawdowns from February to April due to trade war volatility and abrupt trend reversals.
New regimes emerge faster than narratives form
Systematic processes force participation in new trends before a thesis can be developed or approved by investment committees, which is essential during fast shifts comparable to the COVID bottom.
⚙️ Systematic Discipline Across Timeframes 2 insights
Diversify across timeframes, don't time them
Eric allocates equally to short, medium, and long-term systems rather than overweighting based on recent performance, accepting slightly lower long-term returns for smoother compounding that prevents emotion-driven errors.
Filters create whipsaw risk in new environments
Using GDP or interest rate filters to adjust positioning often fails during counterintuitive regime shifts that happen fast, whereas systematic processes force participation in new trends before a narrative develops.
🛠️ The Art of Not Tinkering 3 insights
Research actively, implement rarely
While continuously researching improvements, Eric applies extreme skepticism to new concepts, requiring that any change solve more problems than it creates across decades of data rather than just optimizing recent drawdowns.
Simple, blunt tools outperform complexity
Successful long-term managers use durable systems implementable even in the 1970s rather than elaborate modern techniques, as complexity often introduces fragility and unintended consequences.
Sitting on hands is correct 85% of the time
The hardest discipline is resisting changes during emotional drawdowns; having a team and board to check recency bias prevents destructive tinkering when thinking is clouded by pressure.
Bottom Line
Maintain equal allocation to short, medium, and long-term trend systems without macro filters, and rigorously resist modifying them during drawdowns—even when research suggests 'improvements'—because simple, durable tools compound better over decades than optimized complex ones.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked a $1 Billion Quant Manager Why Concentration Isn't a Warning — and Small Caps Aren't Dead
Quant manager Matt Zens argues that record market concentration isn't inherently dangerous and current AI leaders may not dominate forever, emphasizing that global diversification and small caps reduce risk while wide valuation spreads suggest potential value opportunities ahead.
The $600 Billion Loop | Jeff Klingelhofer on AI, the Return of Bonds and the Fed's Third Mandate
Jeff Klingelhofer details how a fragile $600 billion AI capital expenditure loop—where tech spending drives stock gains that fuel high-end consumer spending—currently props up the economy, while arguing that fixed income has reclaimed its traditional role as a genuine portfolio hedge with 5-6% yields available as the Fed shifts focus back to fighting inflation rather than supporting asset prices.
Expensive Market. AI Backlash. Are Investors Pricing the Wrong Risk? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Warren Pies warns that AI faces mounting bipartisan regulatory backlash against data centers and poor leadership messaging, while Meb Faber argues that expensive US valuations and inevitable bear markets require age-appropriate diversification beyond market-cap weighted stocks.
He Studied 250 Years of Market History | Meb Faber on Why America Won — And If It Can Last
Meb Faber discusses his new book 'Investing in America,' arguing that U.S. market dominance stems from a unique cultural foundation of ownership dating back to colonial joint stock companies, while presenting data showing stocks become less volatile than bonds over 20-year periods and remain the most reliable engine for long-term wealth creation.