Vibe-Coding an Attention Firewall, w/ Steve Newman, creator of The Curve
TL;DR
Steve Newman, creator of Google Docs and founder of the Golden Gate Institute for AI, shares his suite of 15+ bespoke AI tools designed to filter overwhelming information flows and reclaim deep focus time, demonstrating an iterative 'vibe coding' approach that prioritizes personal utility over agent optimization.
📰 Taming Information Overload 2 insights
Static LLM summarization pipeline
Newman processes 50+ daily newsletters and podcasts through a simple RSS reader that feeds full text to an LLM with static prompts, generating two-level summaries without context memory or cross-referencing against past reads.
Rapid triage over perfect filtering
Rather than building complex systems to detect novelty against his reading history, he relies on 10-second skims of one-paragraph summaries to identify new angles on topics like AI model releases.
🛡️ The Attention Firewall 2 insights
Aggregated urgency filtering
A system pulls emails, Slack, WhatsApp, and Signal into a unified pipeline where an LLM evaluates each message against a one-page rubric of exceptions to surface only truly urgent items.
Dedicated monitor for interruptions
After 40 years of single-monitor use, Newman added a second screen exclusively to display his calendar and rolling urgent messages, eliminating the habit of checking messaging apps 30 times daily.
💻 Vibe Coding Philosophy 3 insights
Anti-token maxing mindset
Newman adheres to the principle that 'the agent's not important, I'm important,' prioritizing tools that reduce his time in the chair rather than optimizing agent performance or capability.
Iterative discovery over planning
He describes building his attention firewall through fumbling iteration without initial clear vision, noting that we're collectively experiencing a 'Cambrian explosion' of personal tooling without playbooks.
Conservative security boundaries
Despite historically borderline negligent security practices, he now maintains strict boundaries against auto-responding or autonomous action due to duty of care for others' data entrusted to him.
Bottom Line
Build AI tools iteratively to reclaim your own time and attention rather than optimizing for agent performance, while maintaining strict security guardrails when handling communications containing others' data.
More from Cognitive Revolution
View all
Intelligence on the Edge: Liquid AI's Ramin Hasani on the Search for Device-Native Foundation Models
Liquid AI CEO Ramin Hasani details how his company is building device-native foundation models using biologically-inspired 'liquid neural networks' that deliver robust out-of-distribution generalization with minimal computational resources, enabling sophisticated AI to run directly on edge devices rather than cloud data centers.
Fable's Back, AI Engineer Recap, & SambaNova
Anthropic's Fable model returns after a government safety review with refined defense-in-depth safeguards, coinciding with OpenAI's launch of GPT 5.6 Soul Ultra, creating a fragmented market where users must navigate significant pricing disparities and distinct capability trade-offs between frontier models.
1000 Designs a Day: Neural Concept's Thomas von Tschammer on AI-Native Engineering
Neural Concept is replacing days-long physics simulations with AI models that deliver results in minutes, enabling automotive manufacturers to explore thousands of designs daily rather than dozens annually. This shift allows engineers to focus on high-level trade-offs while agentic co-pilots handle iterative optimization across domains like aerodynamics, crash safety, and thermal management.
AI:AM #4: Cameron on Model Consciousness, Duvenaud's Gradual Disempowerment, swyx's AI-Eng Alpha
Consciousness researcher Cameron Berg demonstrates that frontier AI models score 30-45% on scientific consciousness indicators using automated theory-based evaluation, while revealing that internal "valence" representations governing welfare states can be directly steered to impact model safety and alignment behaviors.