They are history’s geniuses. But were they any good at investing? | The Story of Money Podcast
TL;DR
Despite possessing world-changing intellect and political genius, historical figures like Isaac Newton and Winston Churchill proved terrible investors, destroyed by the same emotional pitfalls—FOMO, overtrading, and leverage—that plague modern retail traders.
🧠 The Intelligence Trap 3 insights
Genius doesn't guarantee market returns
Finance firms recruit elite physicists and mathematicians assuming IQ correlates with alpha, but history shows intellectual brilliance often coexists with disastrous financial decision-making.
Newton's South Sea Bubble catastrophe
After cashing out near the peak for a £1.2 billion equivalent gain, Newton succumbed to FOMO and reinvested at the absolute top, losing 40% of his fortune.
The madness of crowds over calculus
Despite inventing calculus and mastering celestial mechanics, Newton admitted he could calculate planetary orbits but not human irrationality.
📉 Churchill's Leveraged Gambling 3 insights
Journalistic wealth fueled speculation
Churchill earned modern equivalent of £480,000 per article and £80 million book advances, providing capital for reckless trading during his 1929 US book tour.
Accidental margin trading disaster
Churchill discovered margin trading without understanding the risks, executing £80 million equivalent in turnover over nine days and losing his entire advance through speculation rather than the market crash.
Citadel-level turnover, retail-level results
His trading frequency rivaled modern high-frequency shops, but excessive leverage and lack of discipline completely wiped out his multi-million pound income.
💰 Measuring Historical Wealth 2 insights
GDP adjustment reveals true scale
While inflation calculators show Newton's £20,000 as £3.6 million today, GDP-adjusted figures better capture his actual economic power at approximately £1.2 billion.
Dynastic purchasing power
Measuring wealth against contemporary economic output rather than consumer baskets shows these figures held billionaire-level status comparable to modern ultra-high-net-worth individuals.
Bottom Line
Emotional discipline and risk management consistently outperform raw intelligence in investing; if geniuses like Newton and Churchill couldn't time markets or resist leverage, average investors should focus on boring, diversified strategies rather than trying to outsmart crowds.
More from Financial Times
View all
Why Big Oil is opening new frontiers | FT Film
Suriname is betting a $10.5 billion offshore oil project will rescue its economy from recession and an IMF bailout, while claiming fossil fuel revenues will fund rainforest conservation—a paradox that highlights the tension between global energy security demands and climate goals in an era of disrupted Middle Eastern supply.
India and the true cost of coal | FT Film
Despite powering 75% of India's electricity and supporting 20 million livelihoods, coal imposes a devastating toll of 1.5 million pollution-related deaths annually, forcing the world's fastest-growing economy to balance energy security with its 2070 net-zero pledge through a complex, decades-long transition.
More in News
View all
LIVE: Fans in Vancouver watch Canada vs Bosnia and Herzegovina in World Cup
Vancouver fans gather at Granville Island for a lively outdoor watch party as Canada opens their 2026 FIFA World Cup campaign against Bosnia and Herzegovina, with the underdogs taking a surprising first-half lead despite Canada's dominant possession.
SpaceX Makes History With Biggest-Ever IPO | Bloomberg Tech 6/12/2026
SpaceX debuted on public markets with shares indicated to open at $155-$162, implying a $2 trillion valuation that ranks among the world's largest companies immediately. The IPO marks a strategic pivot from rocket reusability to AI infrastructure, with xAI's cloud deals potentially dominating revenue alongside Starlink's growth.