They are history’s geniuses. But were they any good at investing? | The Story of Money Podcast

| News | April 22, 2026 | 5.79 Thousand views | 39:48

TL;DR

Despite possessing world-changing intellect and political genius, historical figures like Isaac Newton and Winston Churchill proved terrible investors, destroyed by the same emotional pitfalls—FOMO, overtrading, and leverage—that plague modern retail traders.

🧠 The Intelligence Trap 3 insights

Genius doesn't guarantee market returns

Finance firms recruit elite physicists and mathematicians assuming IQ correlates with alpha, but history shows intellectual brilliance often coexists with disastrous financial decision-making.

Newton's South Sea Bubble catastrophe

After cashing out near the peak for a £1.2 billion equivalent gain, Newton succumbed to FOMO and reinvested at the absolute top, losing 40% of his fortune.

The madness of crowds over calculus

Despite inventing calculus and mastering celestial mechanics, Newton admitted he could calculate planetary orbits but not human irrationality.

📉 Churchill's Leveraged Gambling 3 insights

Journalistic wealth fueled speculation

Churchill earned modern equivalent of £480,000 per article and £80 million book advances, providing capital for reckless trading during his 1929 US book tour.

Accidental margin trading disaster

Churchill discovered margin trading without understanding the risks, executing £80 million equivalent in turnover over nine days and losing his entire advance through speculation rather than the market crash.

Citadel-level turnover, retail-level results

His trading frequency rivaled modern high-frequency shops, but excessive leverage and lack of discipline completely wiped out his multi-million pound income.

💰 Measuring Historical Wealth 2 insights

GDP adjustment reveals true scale

While inflation calculators show Newton's £20,000 as £3.6 million today, GDP-adjusted figures better capture his actual economic power at approximately £1.2 billion.

Dynastic purchasing power

Measuring wealth against contemporary economic output rather than consumer baskets shows these figures held billionaire-level status comparable to modern ultra-high-net-worth individuals.

Bottom Line

Emotional discipline and risk management consistently outperform raw intelligence in investing; if geniuses like Newton and Churchill couldn't time markets or resist leverage, average investors should focus on boring, diversified strategies rather than trying to outsmart crowds.

More from Financial Times

View all
India and the true cost of coal | FT Film
20:43
Financial Times Financial Times

India and the true cost of coal | FT Film

Despite powering 75% of India's electricity and supporting 20 million livelihoods, coal imposes a devastating toll of 1.5 million pollution-related deaths annually, forcing the world's fastest-growing economy to balance energy security with its 2070 net-zero pledge through a complex, decades-long transition.

3 months ago · 10 points

More in News

View all
Venture capital legend, Bill Gurley.
49:43
Forbes Forbes

Venture capital legend, Bill Gurley.

Venture capitalist Bill Gurley argues that chasing "fascination"—not just passion—drives outsized career success, as those endlessly curious about their field accumulate deeper expertise and move faster, especially in the AI era. Drawing from his book "Running Down a Dream," he explains how to avoid climbing the wrong ladder through tactical career experiments and peer co-learning.

about 5 hours ago · 10 points
Consumer Confidence Just Hit a Record Low. Here’s Why
46:12
Yahoo Finance Yahoo Finance

Consumer Confidence Just Hit a Record Low. Here’s Why

Consumer sentiment has collapsed to a historic low of 49.8 amid the Iran conflict, surpassing levels seen during the pandemic and financial crisis. Economists warn this extreme pessimism is triggering demand destruction on durable goods, while corporations brace for significant cost headwinds from elevated energy prices.

1 day ago · 9 points