The Idiot - Chapter 4 | Serial Productions
TL;DR
Masha Gesson documents the sentencing of her cousin Allan for attempting to hire a hitman to kill his ex-wife, then establishes a correspondence with him in prison to understand how a privileged Moscow youth became a domestic abuser capable of murder-for-hire.
⚖️ The Sentencing Hearing 3 insights
Judge imposes maximum ten-year sentence despite contrition
Judge Corley acknowledged Allan's tearful remorse but emphasized his multiple opportunities to abandon the plot, including delivering a gold coin, $23,000, and scheduling details to the undercover agent.
Generous character witnesses contradict domestic violence pattern
While dozens of letters praised Allan's kindness, the judge noted this tragic dichotomy is typical of domestic abusers who compartmentalize their cruelty to hide it from friends.
Legal background compounds ethical violation
As a barred attorney who took an oath to uphold the law, Allan's attempt to bribe officials and arrange kidnapping represented a profound professional betrayal that warranted the maximum penalty.
📞 Prison Interviews and Evasion 3 insights
Conspiracy theories substitute for genuine reflection
Allan initially claimed his case was connected to Ukrainian politicians and money laundering investigations, offering elaborate context while avoiding any explanation for soliciting murder.
Daily calls build reluctant rapport through isolation
Despite initial mutual mistrust, the narrator found herself looking forward to Allan's descriptions of prison life, creating a dynamic where he performed innocence while seeking connection.
Persistent denial and minimization of crimes
Allan characterized kidnapping his son as merely accelerating a moving schedule and insisted he only wanted deportation, contradicting trial evidence of his specific instructions to the hitman.
🧩 Immigration and Identity Formation 3 insights
Traumatic loss of status at age fifteen
Moving from a culturally privileged, centrally located Moscow childhood to suburban Massachusetts left Allan stripped of the social competence and security he had cultivated in the Soviet Union.
Crushing comparison to successful cousin
While Allan struggled to adapt and learn English, his cousin Keith became a Harvard-bound valedictorian and sports star, embodying the American success that magnified Allan's feelings of inadequacy.
Intellectual privilege masked childhood poverty
Though materially poor in Moscow, Allan enjoyed a rich life among artists and writers, making his post-immigration isolation and menial constraints feel particularly degrading and embittering.
🎭 The Psychology of Control 3 insights
Maternal bond highlights lethal hypocrisy
The judge noted the devastating irony that Allan cherished his own mother as his strongest bond yet was willing to deprive his children of their mother permanently.
Calculated opportunism versus impulsive anger
Allan exploited Priscilla's absence in Zimbabwe to secretly move their belongings and flee with their son, demonstrating methodical planning rather than a momentary loss of temper.
Inability to acknowledge victim's reality
Even when appearing contrite, Allan insisted Priscilla blamed him for everything including acts of God, revealing a narcissistic worldview that prevented genuine accountability.
Bottom Line
To understand how charming, intelligent people commit horrific acts, one must look beyond their presented personas to examine early narcissistic injuries and patterns of entitlement that enable them to rationalize domestic violence as self-defense.
More from New York Times Podcasts
View all
What Do You Do When a Family Member Commits a Terrible Crime? | 'The Opinions' Podcast
Author Harriet Clark, whose mother served 37 years in prison for a deadly robbery, joins New York Times columnist M. Gesson—whose cousin is serving a 10-year sentence for plotting to kill his ex-wife—to discuss how families navigate relationships with incarcerated relatives who have committed serious crimes, arguing that maintaining parent-child connections serves children's wellbeing better than permanent removal.
The Supreme Court Takes On Birthright Citizenship
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship, with justices from across the ideological spectrum expressing skepticism toward the administration's novel interpretation of the 14th Amendment's 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' clause.
Zendaya & Robert Pattinson on ‘The Drama’, Marriage, and Dredging Up The Past
Zendaya and Robert Pattinson discuss their film "The Drama," exploring how a pre-wedding secret exposes the terror of intimacy and debating whether lasting love requires total transparency or healthy boundaries.
Tinned Fish is Finally Having the Moment It Deserves
Tinned fish has transformed from pantry staple into a luxury food trend in the US, driven by pandemic pantry stocking and TikTok aesthetics. After testing over 100 cans, Wirecutter recommends starting with mild trout or salmon before advancing to oily sardines or texturally challenging mollusks, with premium prices reflecting artisanal hand-packing methods.