The AI Trade Has a Problem | Ben Hunt, Brent Kochuba and Aahan Menon on What Could Derail It
TL;DR
Markets are ignoring geopolitical exhaustion and inflation shocks to focus on AI's transformative potential, creating a disconnect where stocks 'crash higher' despite risks while systematic macro investors focus on resilient economic data.
⚡ The AI-Macro Disconnect 2 insights
Market pricing in 2030 AI fundamentals today
Investors are trading on potential 2030-2031 earnings power from transformative AI technology, overriding traditional macro concerns like inflation and geopolitical risk.
Unprecedented bullishness on AI buildout
Market positioning has never been more bullish on AI infrastructure construction despite spiking negative political narratives around data centers and societal role.
🌍 Geopolitical Exhaustion 2 insights
Strait of Hormuz creating narrative fatigue
Constant deal speculation and confusion around the conflict has created market exhaustion, causing investors to suppress the risk rather than price it appropriately.
Binary outcome risks remain extreme
The market is ignoring potentially disastrous geopolitical outcomes while focusing on AI, creating a wide distribution of possible mean shifts if conditions change.
📈 Economic Resilience 2 insights
Systematic macro strategies outperforming
The most successful approaches this year have ignored forward pricing and geopolitical noise to simply allocate based on current economic trend following.
Nominal GDP running historically hot
Daily nowcasts show nominal GDP growth remains very strong, driven by resilient consumer spending and the largest AI capex contribution to GDP in history.
⚠️ Positioning Extremes 2 insights
NASDAQ at peak implied volatility with call concentration
Major tech names sit at their most expensive option valuations ever while investors are heavily piled into call options, creating a 'crashing higher' dynamic.
Earnings estimates driving sector dispersion
Market returns are tracking changes in analyst earnings estimates almost exactly, with winning sectors rising proportional to estimate upgrades and losers falling with downgrades.
Bottom Line
Focus on systematic economic trend signals rather than narrative noise, while maintaining awareness that extreme AI positioning and geopolitical exhaustion create vulnerability to sudden regime shifts.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked Robert Hagstrom Why MPT Forgot What Matters in Investing — and What He Does Instead
Robert Hagstrom argues that Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) fundamentally erred by defining risk as price volatility rather than margin of safety, creating an institutional framework that prioritizes emotionally comfortable investing over the primary objective of making money, while business owners focus on cash flows and intrinsic value.
Cheap Is a Warning, Not a Thesis | Adam Parker on What This Market Is Really Pricing
Adam Parker argues that buying stocks simply because they appear cheap is an arrogant and ineffective strategy, asserting that markets efficiently price distributions of future fundamentals (2030-2031) rather than current data, while cautioning that only 9% of public companies currently generate meaningful AI revenue despite massive capital expenditure.
We Asked an $850M Trend Manager Why Only 6 Funds Out of 10,000 Deliver What Investors Actually Want
Trend manager Eric Kittinden explains how his $850M fund navigated a severe drawdown during abrupt market reversals by maintaining systematic discipline across multiple timeframes, emphasizing that the best opportunities emerge during periods of maximum psychological and social pressure when most investors abandon the strategy.
He Studied 100 Years of Bubbles. He Exposed Private Equity's Volatility Illusion | The Weekly Wrap
Quant legend Cliff Asness and bubble expert Andy Constan reveal why private equity's smoothed returns create a dangerous volatility illusion, and how bubbles trick investors into leveraging up precisely when risk is highest through artificially low volatility and trending markets.