The $2 Trillion Question | Tobias Carlisle on SpaceX, the AI Buildout, and the Rotation No One Sees
TL;DR
Tobias Carlisle warns that the market is at historic valuation extremes comparable to the dot-com bubble, but argues investors should rotate into deeply undervalued small and micro-cap value stocks rather than exit entirely, as early indicators suggest a potential decade-long rotation away from large-cap growth; meanwhile, he cautions that the massive AI infrastructure buildout risks following historical boom-bust patterns where value accrues to consumers, not creators.
📊 Market Valuation Reality Check 3 insights
Historic overvaluation across all metrics
Adviser Perspectives tracks six to seven valuation metrics (Shiller PE, Tobin's Q, market trend deviations) that collectively show the market is at its most expensive level in the dataset, comparable only to the peak of the dot-com bubble.
The AI paradigm vs. mean reversion
Current sky-high multiples are only justified if AI creates a permanent singularity where mega-caps earn supernormal returns forever; if historical mean reversion holds, investors face reduced forward returns and heightened volatility.
Avoid market timing, seek value pockets
Rather than exiting the market entirely due to expensive headlines, investors should hunt for undervalued segments, as bifurcated markets often hide reasonable opportunities beneath the surface.
🔄 The Rotation to Value and Small Caps 3 insights
Early reversal signals flashing
Small caps have recently outperformed the Magnificent 7, while equal-weight S&P 500 (RSP) has begun outperforming market-cap weight, suggesting the decade-long large-growth dominance is showing cracks.
Valuation spreads at extremes
The gap between the most expensive and cheapest stocks sits in the 95th percentile, a level previously seen only at major bottoms like March 2009 and March 2020, indicating potential for significant mean reversion.
Historical cycle positioning
After a 10+ year large-growth bull market (2015-present), the market appears to be transitioning into a value cycle that could persist for 10-15 years, similar to the 2000-2015 period.
🤖 Risks in the AI Infrastructure Boom 3 insights
Accelerated depreciation cycles
Unlike railroads or fiber optics with 25-year lifespans, AI data center equipment turns over every 5-7 years, requiring massive ongoing capital expenditure just to maintain capacity.
Value capture uncertainty
It's entirely conceivable that all economic value from AI accrues to consumers rather than model creators, particularly as users may settle for cheaper, older-generation models rather than paying premium prices for cutting-edge versions.
Gartner hype cycle risks
While AI may eventually exceed its transformative promises (as the internet did post-2000), the path likely includes a trough of disillusionment and potential crash as investment runs ahead of immediate monetization.
🎯 Strategic Positioning for Investors 3 insights
Target deep value segments
Small, micro, and mid-cap value stocks currently trade at discounts to long-term averages and offer superior forward returns even without multiple expansion, simply through earnings reinvestment.
Earnings inflection emerging
After declining since 2022, small and mid-cap earnings appear to be bottoming and rising again, while large-cap tech earnings that drove the market were artificially inflated.
The mean reversion bet
If you believe in mean reversion, the smart bet is concentrated in small and micro value, where compressed multiples offer asymmetric upside as the valuation gap normalizes.
Bottom Line
Rotate portfolio exposure toward small and micro-cap value stocks to capitalize on an emerging decade-long rotation away from overvalued large-cap growth, while maintaining skepticism that massive AI infrastructure spending will translate to sustained supernormal returns for the companies building it.
More from Excess Returns
View all
The Trillion-Dollar Gap | We Asked Aswath Damodaran What SpaceX Is Really Worth
Finance professor Aswath Damodaran analyzes SpaceX's $2.7 trillion valuation, finding that while the space launch and Starlink businesses hold real competitive advantages, the AI division's projected $26 trillion market relies on terrible unit economics and a contradictory strategy of renting data centers to direct competitors.
The $700 Billion Shift | Andy Constan on What Happens When Buybacks Turn into Issuance
Andy Constan explains the historic shift from share buybacks to net equity issuance—a $600-700 billion reversal driven by AI infrastructure spending—while analyzing why SpaceX's record-breaking IPO succeeded by balancing the conflicting interests of issuers, employees, and underwriters.
When the Fire Hose Meets the Megatrend | 4 Things That Surprised Us This Week
Portfolio strategist Mike Green and Vanguard economist Joe Davis discuss how passive investing is distorting traditional market dynamics by concentrating liquidity in large-cap volatile stocks, while long-term megatrends—particularly AI, demographics, and fiscal deficits—increasingly drive near-term economic cycles and asset prices.
The Largest IPO in History Meets a Huge Options Expiration | Brent Kochuba on What Comes Next
SpaceX's record-breaking $75 billion IPO at 100x sales has created a liquidity-driven 'flows game' where fundamentals are irrelevant, setting up potential gamma squeeze dynamics as options begin trading June 16th, while MAG 7 stocks were sold ahead of time to fund allocations.