LIVE: Reality TV's Taylor Frankie Paul appears in Utah court

Conflicting accounts of February 23 assault

Taylor alleges Dakota slammed her head into the dashboard and struck her knee and elbow, while Dakota claims she threw a drink and assaulted him during the 6:00 a.m. incident.

Photo evidence documents physical injuries

Exhibits E and F show progressive bruising and discoloration on Taylor's forehead and knee, allegedly taken within hours of the incident to track color changes.

Post-incident texts contradict victim narrative

Exhibit G reveals Mortonson texted "Do you want to fuck?" and demanded Taylor open her door immediately after the alleged assault, behavior inconsistent with a fear-based victim response.

Supervision request raised procedurally late

Mortonson initially requested full suspension of parent time rather than supervised visitation, with Taylor's counsel arguing the late request is prejudicial since it wasn't in the original protective order.

Statutory requirements for supervision disputed

Under Utah statute 819207, supervision requires a finding that no less restrictive means exist and the child faces abuse risk unsupervised, standards Taylor's attorney argues are met through existing support networks.

DCFS and therapeutic monitoring already active

Both parties are voluntarily engaged with DCFS case workers—with scheduled visits later that week—and family therapists, creating an existing supervisory framework.

Alleged pattern of button-pushing and provocation

Taylor's attorney characterized Mortonson as "excellent at escalating" conflicts, citing the May 2025 incident where he allegedly used their child as a "human shield" while refusing to leave her home despite repeated demands to exit.

Prior custody decision undermines current safety claims

Mortonson voluntarily granted Taylor custody only six months ago despite eight of the eleven cited incidents in his exhibits having already occurred, suggesting inconsistent concerns about child safety.

Anger allegedly directed solely at co-parent

Counsel argued Taylor's volatility is exclusively triggered by Mortonson's provocations and poses no risk to the child when parents remain separated, as stipulated in their agreement.