LIVE: Britain's Starmer answers questions on the vetting process for Mandelson
TL;DR
Prime Minister Keir Starmer admitted to Parliament that appointing Peter Mandelson as US ambassador was a wrong judgment, revealing that Foreign Office officials granted security clearance against official UK Security Vetting recommendations and deliberately concealed this information from ministers for months.
🔒 Security Vetting Override 3 insights
UKSV recommended denying clearance
On January 28, 2025, UK Security Vetting recommended denying Peter Mandelson developed vetting clearance due to his associations with Jeffrey Epstein and other risk factors.
Foreign Office overruled without ministerial knowledge
Despite the negative recommendation, Foreign Office officials granted clearance on January 29, 2025, and chose not to inform the Prime Minister, Foreign Secretary, or Cabinet Secretary.
Information withheld during multiple reviews
The recommendation was concealed from Starmer even when he ordered a vetting review in February 2025, and from former Cabinet Secretary Sir Chris Wormald during his September 2025 review.
⚠️ Accountability and Reforms 3 insights
Starmer accepts responsibility
The Prime Minister admitted his appointment decision was wrong, apologized to Epstein's victims, and confirmed he would have reversed the appointment had he known of the vetting recommendation.
New appointment protocols established
Starmer changed the process to require security vetting completion before public announcements and mandated pre-appointment interviews to assess risks for direct ministerial appointments.
Independent review launched
Sir Adrian Fulford will lead a review into national security vetting decision-making, while the Government Security Group examines any security concerns arising from Mandelson's tenure.
🏛️ Opposition Response 2 insights
Allegations of misleading Parliament
Opposition Leader Kemi Badenoch accused Starmer of breaching the ministerial code by failing to correct the record at the earliest opportunity after discovering the vetting failure.
National security risks emphasized
Badenoch stressed that Mandelson accessed top-secret intelligence for months despite failing vetting, representing a serious national security breach beyond questions of propriety.
Bottom Line
Ministers must be informed of negative security vetting recommendations before finalizing sensitive diplomatic appointments, as the current system's failure to escalate these concerns creates unacceptable national security risks and accountability gaps.
More from Reuters
View all
LIVE: Trump hosts NCAA champions
President Trump hosts seven NCAA championship teams at the White House, honoring their achievements while announcing executive orders to reform college athletics through restrictions on transfers, eligibility limits, and bans on transgender athletes in women's sports.
LIVE: NASA reveals Roman telescope
NASA announced the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is complete and targeting an early September launch, eight months ahead of schedule and under budget. With capabilities to survey the sky 1,000 times faster than Hubble and test coronagraph technology for future exoplanet hunting, the mission aims to revolutionize understanding of dark energy, cosmic structure, and planetary systems.
LIVE: France's Macron meets with Lebanon's Prime Minister Salam
French President Emmanuel Macron met with Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam in Paris to discuss the ongoing conflict, reaffirming France's commitment to humanitarian aid and outlining conditions for regional stabilization including Israeli withdrawal and Hezbollah disarmament.
LIVE: Reuters NEXT Newsmaker with Commonwealth Fusion Systems CEO Bob Mumgaard
Commonwealth Fusion Systems CEO Bob Mumgaard outlines the company's path to commercial fusion power by the early 2030s, emphasizing manufacturing-based scaling, the push for $10 billion in federal fusion funding, and rising energy security concerns driving investment in the technology.