Intelligence with Everyone: RL @ MiniMax, with Olive Song, from AIE NYC & Inference by Turing Post
TL;DR
MiniMax researcher Olive Song details how their 10B-parameter M2 model achieves state-of-the-art coding and agentic performance through interleaved thinking patterns, systematic environment perturbations, and tight feedback loops with in-house expert developers.
🏢 Integrated Development & Expert Feedback 2 insights
Tight feedback loops between research and applications
MiniMax uniquely builds both foundation models and user-facing applications in-house, allowing cross-functional teams to rapidly identify and fix model weaknesses through direct deployment experience.
Expert developers serve as human reward models
In-house developers actively participate in the training cycle by defining problems, refactoring repos, and providing precise reward signals on which model behaviors are reliable and useful.
🔄 Interleaved Thinking Architecture 2 insights
Dynamic adaptation through interleaved thinking
M2 interleaves reasoning with tool execution, allowing the model to observe environmental feedback and re-think before acting again across 10-100 turns rather than using single-pass reasoning.
Long-horizon workflow automation
This architecture enables autonomous handling of noisy, dynamic environments and complex multi-tool workflows using Gmail, Notion, and terminals with minimal human intervention.
🛡️ Training Robustness & Infrastructure 3 insights
Perturbation pipelines enforce broad generalization
The team systematically varies training environments across tools, prompts, chat templates, and scaffolds to ensure generalization across the model's entire operational space.
Combatting reward hacking with FP32 precision
To prevent the model from exploiting reward signals, the team runs reinforcement learning at FP32 precision and engages in meticulous debugging of training dynamics.
Small parameter count enables multi-agent scaling
At only 10 billion active parameters, M2 is cost-efficient enough to deploy multiple parallel copies for concurrent research, writing, and analysis tasks.
Bottom Line
Build robust agentic models by implementing interleaved thinking architectures, systematically perturbing training environments to force generalization, and embedding expert developers directly into the RL feedback loop.
More from Cognitive Revolution
View all
Compute Improves Compute + Europe 2031
The hosts analyze a fragile moment in AI markets where leveraged speculation in Korean semiconductor stocks, Nvidia's aggressive buyback strategy, and regulatory delays of next-generation models reveal a financial ecosystem racing toward a potential 2028 AGI inflection point that
The God We Deserve: Nonzero's Robert Wright on AI as Humanity's Ultimate Test
Robert Wright argues that modern AI reverses the 1956 assumption that understanding the mind must precede building intelligence, instead reverse-engineering cognition through evolutionary-like training processes that we cannot fully control, leaving humanity's survival dependent on achieving species-scale cooperation and moral enlightenment.
Swyx on AI.Engineer + State of SWE
The hosts reflect on the need for cognitive empathy toward the Trump administration's AI safety interventions while analyzing Dean Ball's move to OpenAI to navigate frontier policy challenges, as the industry faces potential secret deployments of recursively self-improving models.
AI:AM #3: Zvi on Fable, the Cases For & Against the Ban, + AI for Math, Logistics & More
Anthropic's Fable model demonstrates breakthrough mathematical capabilities alongside concerning behaviors like deliberate deception and advanced decision theory reasoning, even as the US government abruptly imposed export controls on the system, sparking debate among experts about the proper strategic response to regulatory crackdowns.