How Machiavelli's Florence bargained with Cesare Borgia for survival – Ada Palmer

| Podcasts | June 16, 2026 | 73 Thousand views | 2:08:21

TL;DR

Ada Palmer explains that Machiavelli wrote *The Prince* during a crisis of institutional legitimacy in Italy, where constant papal interference and broken city-state continuity created chaos. His infamous advice was shaped by firsthand experience with Cesare Borgia, against whom Florence's only survival strategy was calculated submission—buying time through abject loyalty until fortune (in the form of a pope's death) intervened.

🏛️ The Crisis of Institutional Legitimacy 3 insights

Broken continuity creates cascading chaos

When long-standing governments fall, rapid successive overthrows follow—like France's revolving regimes or England's Wars of the Roses—because new regimes lack inherited legitimacy.

Papal elections destabilized Italy uniquely

Popes served roughly ten-year terms and were often elected by enemies of their predecessors, leading each new pope to overturn governments arbitrarily and appoint illegitimate sons to power.

Italy faced a perfect storm

Machiavelli perceived a crisis where most Italian polities had recently lost their governing threads while popes maintained precedent to knock down political 'pawns' at will, making stability impossible without a hereditary power strong enough to negotiate with Rome.

⚔️ Surviving Cesare Borgia 4 insights

Florence's impossible geography

Florence sat like a 'puzzle piece' notch in the Papal States that Cesare Borgia had to conquer to secure his kingdom, making military resistance futile and bribery temporary at best.

The 'eat us last' strategy

Machiavelli advised abject submission—breaking 300-year alliances with Bologna, providing troops and money, and constantly whispering loyalty—to buy time until Pope Alexander VI's inevitable death created opportunity.

Firsthand witness to terror

Machiavelli was present at the Senigallia massacre where Borgia offered false forgiveness then slaughtered conspirators at dinner, violating sacred hospitality laws yet cementing loyalty through fear rather than love.

Personal stakes revealed

When Machiavelli breaks into first person saying 'He told me' regarding Borgia's contingency plans, he reveals his unique proximity to the conqueror and his family's months-long uncertainty about whether he survived the massacre.

🎲 Fortune, Means, and Moral Judgment 3 insights

Judge actions by probability, not outcome

Machiavelli argues we must evaluate deeds based on the most probable outcome before fortune intervenes; Borgia fell not through error but through simultaneous illness with his father and untimely pope deaths.

Means determine stability

How power is acquired—through mercenaries, foreign aid, or native arms—determines how durable it will be, making the method of acquisition as crucial as the acquisition itself.

Strategic deceit requires matching your power base

Breaking oaths succeeds when backed by sufficient fear (Borgia) but fails when authority depends on perceived infallibility (Savonarola), showing betrayal must align with the foundation of one's power.

Bottom Line

When facing overwhelming force you cannot defeat, strategic submission to buy time can be more rational than futile resistance, but lasting authority requires matching your methods of rule to your power's specific foundation and establishing institutional continuity that outlasts individual leaders.

More from Dwarkesh Patel

View all
Sarah Paine - Why Russia and China can't escape geography
1:02:07
Dwarkesh Patel Dwarkesh Patel

Sarah Paine - Why Russia and China can't escape geography

Sarah Paine argues that geography fundamentally constrains Russia and China to remain continental 'elephants' dependent on land armies and territorial expansion, lacking the geographic moats, sea access, and institutional stability required to become maritime 'whales' regardless of their ambitions.

10 days ago · 10 points
What remains scarce after AGI? – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell
1:16:09
Dwarkesh Patel Dwarkesh Patel

What remains scarce after AGI? – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell

Alex Imas and Phil Trammell analyze what remains scarce after AGI, arguing that while a 'relational sector' where humans provide intrinsic value may persist, increasing variety in capital goods could cause labor share to collapse to zero unless we collect critical data on consumer preferences for human involvement.

15 days ago · 10 points
Chip design from the bottom up – Reiner Pope
1:20:20
Dwarkesh Patel Dwarkesh Patel

Chip design from the bottom up – Reiner Pope

Reiner Pope explains how AI chips work from fundamental logic gates up, revealing that the physical cost of moving data between memory and compute units (via multiplexers) often exceeds the cost of the actual mathematical operations, and that circuit area scales quadratically with precision, making low-precision arithmetic exponentially more efficient than commonly assumed.

28 days ago · 9 points
Building AlphaGo from scratch – Eric Jang
2:37:18
Dwarkesh Patel Dwarkesh Patel

Building AlphaGo from scratch – Eric Jang

Eric Jang demonstrates how modern LLM coding tools and algorithmic improvements have democratized AI research, enabling a single researcher to rebuild AlphaGo for thousands of dollars rather than millions, while explaining how Monte Carlo Tree Search combined with neural networks solved a game previously considered computationally intractable.

about 1 month ago · 9 points