How Far Will Trump Go in Iran? | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
TL;DR
Mark Dubowitz, CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, argues the US is decisively winning its three-week military campaign against Iran by degrading missile, naval and nuclear capabilities, but warns that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz represents an inevitable confrontation that must be resolved now—while Iran is weakened—rather than postponed to a future where a cash-rich, nuclear-armed Iran could dominate the Gulf.
🎯 Military Degradation Achievements 3 insights
Ballistic missile production eliminated
Iran's pre-war capacity to produce 100 ballistic missiles monthly has been reduced to zero, with missile launchers reduced by two-thirds from the largest inventory in the Middle East.
Navy decimated and nuclear setback
The Iranian Navy has been effectively destroyed and the nuclear program severely set back through combined US-Israeli strikes building on the 12-day war last year.
Remaining asymmetric threats
Despite degradation, Iran retains capacity to fire missiles at regional neighbors and has successfully closed the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global energy markets and desalination infrastructure.
🔄 Three-Phase Strategy for Victory 3 insights
Phase 1: Destroy war-making capability
Current military operations focus on eliminating missiles, naval forces and nuclear infrastructure to prevent Iran from threatening the American homeland.
Phase 2: Decapitate repression apparatus
Israel is systematically eliminating IRGC, Basij, police and intelligence leaders responsible for crushing domestic opposition, beginning with the February 28 strike that killed former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Phase 3: Empower Iranian opposition
Providing maximum support to Iranian protesters ensures they will not be "defenseless" when they next challenge the regime, creating conditions for regime change without US boots on the ground.
⚓ The Hormuz Timing Debate 3 insights
The inevitability argument
Dubowitz contends Iran would eventually close Hormuz with nuclear weapons, ICBMs and $1 trillion in sanctions relief if not stopped now, making this the least dangerous moment to confront Tehran.
Retaliation vs. strategy
Ross Douthat challenges that Iran closed the strait specifically in response to regime leadership targeting, not as inevitable strategy, suggesting periodic military pressure could manage Iran without triggering global economic crisis.
The 2029 presidency problem
Dubowitz argues no future US president—unlike Trump—would likely authorize military action necessary to prevent Iranian reconstitution, making immediate decisive action essential before a potential administration unwilling to confront Tehran.
Bottom Line
The United States must reject negotiations that allow the Iranian regime to survive and instead complete the military campaign to open the Strait of Hormuz while covertly supporting internal opposition, as any delay or deal will enable Iran to reconstitute into a nuclear-armed regional hegemon that future American administrations will lack the will to confront.
More from Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
View all
White Identity Is Galvanizing the Right | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Claremont Institute senior fellow Jeremy Carl defends his State Department nomination and book "The Unprotected Class," arguing that disparate impact laws, mass immigration since 1965, and DEI initiatives have created systemic discrimination against white Americans—a condition he terms "cultural genocide"—while insisting he advocates civic nationalism rather than white nationalism.
The Democrats Could Still Screw This Up | Interesting Times With Ross Douthat
Despite being 'crushed' in 2024 with only 28% favorability, Democrats are regaining confidence due to Trump's perceived overreach on constitutional authority and tariffs, though deep internal conflicts over tactics, generational leadership, and divisive policy battles threaten recovery without a clear affirmative vision for the country.
Will the Iran War Break MAGA? | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Despite Trump campaigning on ending endless wars, his second administration has become hawkish, launching wars with Iran and interventions in multiple countries, betraying the America First movement that helped elect him.
NASA Wants What Musk Wants: Moon Bases and Mars Colonies | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman outlines a viable 10-year timeline for Mars missions contingent on sustained political will, while detailing how the Artemis program will transition from expensive test flights using legacy shuttle hardware to a permanent lunar base serving as a proving ground for deep space survival and resource extraction.