He Studied 100 Years of Bubbles. He Exposed Private Equity's Volatility Illusion | The Weekly Wrap

| Stock Investing | May 24, 2026 | 1.02 Thousand views | 1:06:30

TL;DR

Quant legend Cliff Asness and bubble expert Andy Constan reveal why private equity's smoothed returns create a dangerous volatility illusion, and how bubbles trick investors into leveraging up precisely when risk is highest through artificially low volatility and trending markets.

📊 Redefining Risk Measurement 3 insights

Volatility predicts long-term outcomes

Asness argues that securities with higher short-term volatility generally exhibit wider dispersion of five- and ten-year returns, making it a practical tool for portfolio construction despite its imperfections.

Private equity conceals true risk

Private equity appears less volatile than public markets (5% vs. 17% annually) only because prices aren't marked to market daily, creating a dangerous illusion of safety while actual economic risk remains identical.

Permanent loss is circular logic

Defining risk solely as permanent loss of capital is vacuous because investors cannot guarantee that depressed assets will recover, as demonstrated by markets like Russia where drawdowns became permanent.

🎈 Bubble Mechanics and Behavior 3 insights

Low volatility fuels leverage

Constan explains that bubble regimes uniquely combine trending markets with low realized volatility, tricking investors into believing portfolios are safe and causing them to maximize leverage at peak systemic risk.

Risk targeting inflates bubbles

The behavioral tendency to add risk when experiencing smooth returns—called risk targeting—serves as the actual inflation mechanism, as investors shift from indexes to concentrated bets, margin, and options.

Humility requires systematic guardrails

Rather than timing bubble peaks, investors should establish predetermined leverage maximums (e.g., 130% normally, reduced to 110% in bubble regimes) to counteract natural behavioral tendencies.

⚠️ Investment Process Discipline 2 insights

Separate conviction from risk control

Portfolio construction must divorce the question of what will happen from how bad is it if I'm wrong, requiring independent risk oversight even when investment confidence is highest.

Volatility drives behavior

Unlike theoretical definitions of risk, volatility directly impacts investor behavior and survival during drawdowns, making it the most relevant risk measure for the 99.9% of investors who aren't Warren Buffett.

Bottom Line

Establish predetermined leverage caps and systematically reduce exposure when markets enter low-volatility trending regimes, recognizing that smooth portfolio returns often indicate maximum hidden risk rather than safety.

More from Excess Returns

View all
We Asked Ben Carlson How an 86% Crash Still Led to 8% Annual Returns
57:07
Excess Returns Excess Returns

We Asked Ben Carlson How an 86% Crash Still Led to 8% Annual Returns

Financial expert Ben Carlson explains that successful long-term investing requires accepting unavoidable risk, resisting action bias during volatility, and understanding that even an 86% crash in 1929 couldn't prevent 8% annual returns for patient investors who avoided panic selling.

5 days ago · 8 points