He Quantified 200 Years of Disruption | Kai Wu on Separating Software Survivors from Value Traps
TL;DR
Kai Wu of Sparkline Capital analyzes why software stocks are trading at historic discounts (10% below market for the first time in 20 years) and presents a framework using 200 years of patent data to distinguish between genuine value opportunities and value traps facing AI disruption.
📉 Software's Historic Valuation Low 3 insights
First-ever market discount
Software stocks currently trade at a 10% discount to the S&P 500, flipping from a 20-year historical average of a 32% premium.
COVID bubble to bust
Valuations peaked during the 2021 low-rate environment and have declined continuously through 2024 to reach five-decade lows.
Data spanning two centuries
Research extending back to 1980 confirms current software valuations relative to the market are at all-time lows.
🪤 The Anatomy of Value Traps 3 insights
Disguised cheapness
Value traps display attractive price-to-earnings ratios while earnings are actually heading toward zero due to technological obsolescence.
The fundamental lag
Stock prices predict disruption years before fundamentals deteriorate, as Blockbuster and Borders maintained revenue per share for years after their stocks began collapsing.
Classic cautionary tales
Radio Shack, Borders, Blockbuster, and McClatchy appeared cheap during disruption by Amazon and Netflix but were actually terminal declines.
📊 Quantifying 200 Years of Disruption 3 insights
Patent-based methodology
Analysis of every USPTO patent since 1790 identifies trending technologies that are pervasive across multiple industries rather than isolated to single sectors.
Automated NLP clustering
Natural language processing automatically groups patents into technology waves and maps corporate exposure through earnings calls, filings, and analyst reports.
Compounding disruption waves
Technological threats stack over time, with retail facing successive assaults from e-commerce, digital media, social media, and now AI simultaneously.
🤖 Surviving the AI Era 3 insights
Code is not the moat
Sustainable software companies possess intangible assets beyond code itself, such as data advantages and network effects, that serve as true defenses against AI disruption.
Unprecedented pervasiveness
AI represents a general-purpose technology potentially impacting all economic sectors simultaneously, unlike prior targeted disruptions.
Survivor patterns
Companies in sectors previously exposed to disruption often survived and thrived by leveraging existing intangible assets to adapt rather than being rendered obsolete.
Bottom Line
When evaluating historically cheap software stocks, investors must look beyond valuation multiples to identify durable intangible assets that determine whether a company will survive AI disruption or become a value trap.
More from Excess Returns
View all
We Asked a $1 Billion Quant Manager Why Concentration Isn't a Warning — and Small Caps Aren't Dead
Quant manager Matt Zens argues that record market concentration isn't inherently dangerous and current AI leaders may not dominate forever, emphasizing that global diversification and small caps reduce risk while wide valuation spreads suggest potential value opportunities ahead.
The $600 Billion Loop | Jeff Klingelhofer on AI, the Return of Bonds and the Fed's Third Mandate
Jeff Klingelhofer details how a fragile $600 billion AI capital expenditure loop—where tech spending drives stock gains that fuel high-end consumer spending—currently props up the economy, while arguing that fixed income has reclaimed its traditional role as a genuine portfolio hedge with 5-6% yields available as the Fed shifts focus back to fighting inflation rather than supporting asset prices.
Expensive Market. AI Backlash. Are Investors Pricing the Wrong Risk? | 6 Things We Learned This Week
Warren Pies warns that AI faces mounting bipartisan regulatory backlash against data centers and poor leadership messaging, while Meb Faber argues that expensive US valuations and inevitable bear markets require age-appropriate diversification beyond market-cap weighted stocks.
He Studied 250 Years of Market History | Meb Faber on Why America Won — And If It Can Last
Meb Faber discusses his new book 'Investing in America,' arguing that U.S. market dominance stems from a unique cultural foundation of ownership dating back to colonial joint stock companies, while presenting data showing stocks become less volatile than bonds over 20-year periods and remain the most reliable engine for long-term wealth creation.