AI, Ads, and Outrage: Coca-Cola’s Holiday Backlash
TL;DR
Secret Level founder Jason Zada reveals that Coca-Cola's controversial AI holiday ads required a team of 20+ artists and frame-by-frame human craftsmanship, arguing that the backlash stemmed from AI's 'PR problem' rather than quality issues, while marking a fearless milestone for brand adoption of emerging technology.
🎨 The Craft Behind AI Production 3 insights
AI requires more effort than traditional shooting
Zada argues producing AI content is harder than live-action filming due to detailed prompting and unpredictable outputs he likens to a 'slot machine,' requiring extensive human refinement.
20+ person teams craft every frame
The ad required traditional illustrators and animators working within AI tools, spending weeks handcrafting character performances, wardrobes, and personalities pixel by pixel.
Technology evolved faster than production timelines
Generative AI tools changed so rapidly during the under-one-month production that the team completely remade the spot twice before it aired.
⚡ The Backlash Dynamics 3 insights
Backlash intensified from year one to two
While 2024 brought accusations of job theft, 2025 faced louder 'AI slop' criticism despite AI becoming more mainstream, indicating emotional reactions were escalating rather than fading.
Blind testing reveals the true perception
Research showed audiences loved the ad's warmth and humanity until they learned it was AI, proving the negativity targeted the label rather than the artistic quality.
False narratives fueled online outrage
Critics accused Coca-Cola of stealing jobs and wasting water, claims Zada disputes by noting the project created employment and would not have been produced traditionally.
🚀 Brand Courage & Industry Impact 3 insights
Competitors retreated but Coca-Cola stood firm
While at least one competing brand pulled their AI ad after criticism, Coca-Cola demonstrated 'fearlessness' by standing behind the work and allowing creators to publicly defend the process.
A milestone for commercial production
As one of the world's most iconic brands remaking a beloved 20-year-old classic, the move signals mainstream corporate acceptance and sets a precedent for bravery in adopting controversial technology.
Shifting from 'AI ad' to 'good ad'
Zada emphasizes judging content on artistic merit rather than production method, comparing current AI skepticism to early resistance against CG animation in films.
🌍 Global Perception Gaps 2 insights
American resistance vs. global adoption
While U.S. audiences reacted with hostility, markets in Asia and India embraced the technology without significant backlash, suggesting America is less prepared for AI integration.
Questioning the need for AI labels
Zada argues AI is simply another production tool like CG and will eventually become invisible to consumers, questioning why it requires disclosure when computer graphics do not.
Bottom Line
Brands should evaluate AI-generated content on artistic merit rather than production method, while preparing for cultural resistance that stems from perception rather than quality—making corporate courage essential for innovation in the AI era.
More from Forbes
View all
Santa Meets Silicon: The Story Behind Coca-Cola’s AI Campaign
Coca-Cola CMO Manolo Arroyo explains how the company remade its iconic holiday campaign using generative AI as a 'creative partner' to human storytellers, prioritizing creative quality and brand growth over efficiency while navigating the risks of evolving a 140-year-old heritage brand.
Marketing, Rewritten: Life After the First AI Holiday Campaigns
Creative legend PJ Pereira reveals how Silver Side AI's experimental Coca-Cola holiday film—initially scoped as a minor YouTube clip—became the brand's global campaign, arguing that generative AI's true power lies not in efficiency but in unleashing creative ambition previously constrained by budget and logistics.
AI Ads & Audience Trust: The Coca-Cola Test Case
Journalist and 'story hunter' Josh Davis analyzes Coca-Cola's AI advertising experiments and his own telephonic AI project to argue that resistance to AI is temporary, while the technology's real value lies in eliminating repetitive labor and democratizing storytelling by removing traditional gatekeepers.
Why A Former OnlyFans CEO Is Building The 'HBO Of Social Media'
Former OnlyFans CEO Amy Gan discusses her unconventional path from the cannabis industry to leading the creator platform during its pandemic surge, and how she's applying lessons about creator-first business models to her new venture Violet—a platform positioning itself as the 'HBO of social media' that allows risqué content while prohibiting explicit material.