AI, Ads, and Outrage: Coca-Cola’s Holiday Backlash

| News | June 15, 2026 | 349 views | 34:03

TL;DR

Secret Level founder Jason Zada reveals that Coca-Cola's controversial AI holiday ads required a team of 20+ artists and frame-by-frame human craftsmanship, arguing that the backlash stemmed from AI's 'PR problem' rather than quality issues, while marking a fearless milestone for brand adoption of emerging technology.

🎨 The Craft Behind AI Production 3 insights

AI requires more effort than traditional shooting

Zada argues producing AI content is harder than live-action filming due to detailed prompting and unpredictable outputs he likens to a 'slot machine,' requiring extensive human refinement.

20+ person teams craft every frame

The ad required traditional illustrators and animators working within AI tools, spending weeks handcrafting character performances, wardrobes, and personalities pixel by pixel.

Technology evolved faster than production timelines

Generative AI tools changed so rapidly during the under-one-month production that the team completely remade the spot twice before it aired.

The Backlash Dynamics 3 insights

Backlash intensified from year one to two

While 2024 brought accusations of job theft, 2025 faced louder 'AI slop' criticism despite AI becoming more mainstream, indicating emotional reactions were escalating rather than fading.

Blind testing reveals the true perception

Research showed audiences loved the ad's warmth and humanity until they learned it was AI, proving the negativity targeted the label rather than the artistic quality.

False narratives fueled online outrage

Critics accused Coca-Cola of stealing jobs and wasting water, claims Zada disputes by noting the project created employment and would not have been produced traditionally.

🚀 Brand Courage & Industry Impact 3 insights

Competitors retreated but Coca-Cola stood firm

While at least one competing brand pulled their AI ad after criticism, Coca-Cola demonstrated 'fearlessness' by standing behind the work and allowing creators to publicly defend the process.

A milestone for commercial production

As one of the world's most iconic brands remaking a beloved 20-year-old classic, the move signals mainstream corporate acceptance and sets a precedent for bravery in adopting controversial technology.

Shifting from 'AI ad' to 'good ad'

Zada emphasizes judging content on artistic merit rather than production method, comparing current AI skepticism to early resistance against CG animation in films.

🌍 Global Perception Gaps 2 insights

American resistance vs. global adoption

While U.S. audiences reacted with hostility, markets in Asia and India embraced the technology without significant backlash, suggesting America is less prepared for AI integration.

Questioning the need for AI labels

Zada argues AI is simply another production tool like CG and will eventually become invisible to consumers, questioning why it requires disclosure when computer graphics do not.

Bottom Line

Brands should evaluate AI-generated content on artistic merit rather than production method, while preparing for cultural resistance that stems from perception rather than quality—making corporate courage essential for innovation in the AI era.

More from Forbes

View all
Brooke Monk’s Viral Strategy: Posting Every Day For 6 Years
40:28
Forbes Forbes

Brooke Monk’s Viral Strategy: Posting Every Day For 6 Years

Brooke Monk explains how posting daily for six years straight, starting the day she finished homeschool at 16, allowed her to build a 40-million-follower empire and successfully transition to long-form YouTube content by treating creator work with marathon-level discipline and obsessive attention to platform mechanics.

24 days ago · 9 points